Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Games

Dealing With Fairness and Balance In Video Games 192

MarkN writes "Video games are subject to a number of balance issues from which traditional games have largely stayed free. It can be hard finding players of comparable skill-level to create even match-ups, diverse gameplay options can quickly become irrelevant if someone finds a broken feature that beats everything else, and some online games make your ability to play competitively a question of how much time and money you've invested in a game, rather than the skill you possess. In this article, I talk about some of the issues relating to fairness and balance in games, in terms of the factors and strategies under the player's control, the game's role in potentially handicapping players, and the role a community of gamers plays in setting standards for how games are to be played. What are your thoughts on managing a 'fair and balanced' gaming experience?"
Windows

Windows 7 Lets You Uninstall IE8 474

CWmike writes "A just-leaked build of Windows 7 lets users remove Internet Explorer, the first time that Microsoft has offered the option since it integrated the browser with Windows in 1997, two bloggers reported today. The move might have been prompted by recent charges by the European Union that Microsoft has stifled browser competition by bundling IE with its operating system, the bloggers speculated. One solution under consideration by the EU would require Microsoft to disable IE if the user decided to install a different browser, such as Mozilla's Firefox or Google's Chrome. Microsoft had no comment when asked to confirm whether Windows 7 will let users dump IE8 or whether the option was in reaction to the EU charges."

Comment Re:Willing to identify? (Score 1) 396

How about simple theft? The shows in question weren't broadcast or otherwise distributed to the general public in some fashion by Fox. If these shows were posted to YouTube after they aired, then copyright infringement would be pretty much all that Fox would have as legal ammunition. However, someone illegally removed (stole) these shows from one of the production facilities.
Actually, I'm fairly certain that copyright infringement IS all that they have to charge him with, unless they start getting creative. If I remember correctly, these episodes showed up on bit torrent and the usenet groups around 2 weeks before they aired. A day following their airing they released dvds of the eps for sale and rental.

I don't know for certain what the situation was in this instance, but what I can tell you is that many retail and rental outlets can get these discs anywhere from 2-3 weeks prior to their release, so chances are that's how they were obtained, and probably from several sources. HE probably just got them off of bit torrent and uploaded them to youtube because apparently that's the cool thing to do.

Even if he was the one that actually released the material, I think the most you could charge him with is C.I. (if it was a rental item he ripped it from) or Theft from whatever store he works for if he took something out of the stock room and had to open it in order to do this. Either way it's a sensationalist headline, YouTube's just following the law. Even if there was some room for argument, they're already on the edge of being smashed by lawsuits... why would they want to provoke something based on this fairly straightforward case? When you're in their situation you've got to pick your battles, and this isn't one of them.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Users find the one combination of bizarre input values that shuts down the system for days.

Working...