Comment Re:X through SSH... (Score 0) 359
Yup that was the white elephant in the missing logic of that spec. I think if i -absolutely needed to get something done I would not fire up X on an handheld. smh
Yup that was the white elephant in the missing logic of that spec. I think if i -absolutely needed to get something done I would not fire up X on an handheld. smh
I wonder if I can get a grant to research an acausal link between gullibility and pseudostatistics
as I understand it the sidewinder missile uses a very primitive analog seeker head. I would imagine that it's evolution is a little more than 'closed' so let's see what this different/open parallel effort leads to
For real, even tho I do not use windows (except for virtualized) I am glad to see real benefits of solid research and quick implementation.
I for one am glad to see that not all of the hard work is being done by the attack squad.
Hug a programmer. Hug one today.
Agreed this article was as light as a popcorn fart.
If you only count the current and possibly the previous iteration of so called 'iPhone killers' then maybe in asia their local home brew version will rock, but when you factor in the BBs and other models with a physical screen than the article might be considered just regular flame bait.
In a country that prides itself on style versus function (U.S.A.) It should come as no surprise that Apple succeeds. If the devices are measured on customer satisfaction or human interface design then again apple seems to have it all over other so called 'smart phones'
But if you count it by market share and factored it by fanboy pride - how else can you explain BB not being included (as being the owner of a physical 'qwerty' layout) In the 8 or nine years that I have been anchored to a BB I have _never_ considered getting one for personal use. Now that I have my iPhone the work BB is 'retired'
Summing it up like this... My boss wants to show me all of these other phones that he bought. Me I have nothing to prove.
(null cookie; hope that's ok)