Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Actual argument between USPTO examiners and apple (Score 1) 622

There's some interesting reading to be done on the earlier February case. I can't link to the actual document, but you can use USPTO PAIR (their public information access system) to read the correspondence. Instructions on how to use the system are here: http://intellogist.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/using-uspto-public-pair-part-1/ If you get past the recaptcha and enter "7,657,849" after choosing the "patent" radial button, you can get to the USPTO record. Click the "Image File Wrapper" tab, and check out, among other things, the "Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment" document filed 6/10/2009. Here, looks like the examiners tried to make a rejection on previous gesture patents, but apple's claims specifically state "moving an unlock image along a pre-defined path."
Idle

Submission + - Are Godly Powers Patentable? (wordpress.com)

KWInt1601 writes: "A man who believes he is Christ files a patent application — and the formal dance of responding to office actions from the USPTO begins. Invoking the 1998 State Street decision, the applicant argues, “like software, godly powers is a method, and affects a machine. Like business methods, godly powers produces a useful, concrete, and tangible result, and that should be all that’s needed for statutory material.”"

Slashdot Top Deals

A man is known by the company he organizes. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...