Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Aha! So that's why... (Score 1) 347

FTA: "...In fact, virtually all living creatures emit very weak light, which is thought to be a byproduct of biochemical reactions involving free radicals."

This explains why the city of Berkeley (California) shows up so bright on satellite photos taken at night. Way too many free radicals.

(and I should know... I grew up there!)

Comment Vetusware may be of help (Score 1) 533

Check the site -- It's a site dedicated to archiving "abandonware," software from companies which either no longer exist or have long since discontinued a given product.

There's another site at -- they may be of help as well, even if they don't have what you need listed. Drop 'em a note if they don't.

Happy resurrecting.

Data Storage

Submission + - Western Digital Assumes Customers Are Criminals (

KC7GR writes: "So how would you like to get a nice, network-attached 1TB of storage, billed as "the way" to share your photos, videos and music over your home network — and then discover that you can't use it that way because the manufacturer apparently thinks you can't be trusted? Western Digital, after releasing their new MyBook World Edition storage device and advertising it as "Anywhere, Anytime Access, Share Photos and Files," has thoughtfully pre-crippled the thing so that it will not store or share a long list of file types including AAC, MP3, AVI, and others.

I've seen companies shoot themselves in the foot before, but it seems to me that Western Digital has truly outdone themselves by designing a product to share files, and then disabling its ability to do so. This one truly deserves to (a); go down in flames, or (b); get cracked six ways from Sunday so that it doesn't care what gets stored or shared."

User Journal

Journal Journal: Slashdot's double standard... 1

This post is mainly speculative, so I'm enabling comments for it.

Specifically, I'm wondering why Slashdot thinks it's OK to practice double standards.

Case in point: On Nov. 3rd, I submitted the exact same story as got submitted (and posted) here on Nov. 4th.


Journal Journal: Another "obsolete" item restored!

For a total investment of $29.00 ($20 for the initial purchase, and $9 for a replacement memory battery), I've restored an $8,000 or so late-80's Telephone Network Simulator (essentially a mini-CO in a desktop package) to full functionality. This thing is built like a tank, and was made by TAS (now owned by Spirent Communications), their model 114.


Journal Journal: It works!

Dang, I love it when things work, especially when it's things that other people hastily dub "obsolete" (a word which gets my personal vote for 'Most Despised' in Anyone's Funk and Wagnall's) just because they think it's too old to be useful.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real programs don't eat cache.