Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Itanium vs. Ultrasparc T1 (Score 3, Informative) 272

Your logic is based around the concept that every task is highly parallel - they're simply not.
Well, the server I am logged into right now has 358 processes running. Each of which has a least 1 lwp which equates to at least one thread. How many people have a server running one process with one thread?
Even Sun don't claim that a T1 is comparable to an Itanium/Power/Sparc for tasks which need a few fast cores, which is why they use examples like Java application servers as the primary benchmark.
Like specweb? like sap sd 2 tier? like Lotus notes? These are just the published benches.
The Ultrasparc T1 is not a high-end machine, it's a low end one designed to compete against cheap x86 machines, I think the main surprise for me is that it's not available in a blade form-factor.
Exactly. The T1 costs $26K in it's most expensive config (32GB DDR2) for a 2u system capable of beating out bigger, hotter Itanic, x86 and Power systems on certain workloads (contrary to what you think, those certain workloads represent a significant segment of what customers buy these types of machines to do). There are definite plans to have a blade version out this year.
n 90% or more of workloads out there, a 32 thread core would have about 28 cores sat idle and 4 cores working flat out.
Really? Thats sounds like total bollocks to me.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Aww, if you make me cry anymore, you'll fog up my helmet." -- "Visionaries" cartoon