Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We MUST name and shame publicly! (Score 1) 15

It's as if it was a bad idea to base hiring and promotion on the number of papers published, and then also pay publishers by the number of papers published.

Someone posted this graph:

https://retractionwatch.com/20...

WTF happened in 2008/2009? It's when the idea of paying publishers by the paper instead of them having to convince a bunch of librarians they weren't frauds started to take off (PLOS One launched in 2007).

Comment Re:seafloor TPE menstrual cup inside a dude (Score 1) 111

That's the problem.

Regular submarines are buoyant because the volume of low pressure air enclosed by their hull makes them overall weigh less than the water they displace. They have to carry ballast, which might be weights or water pumped into tanks, in order to dive. This is nice beacause when you want to come back up you can drop the weights.

To dive deeper you need a thicker hull to withstand the pressure. At some point your steel hull plus the enclosed air is heavier than the water it displaces. Then you sink instead of floating, even with no ballast. So you need to carry some means to generate additional buoyancy. We normally use some kind of foam for that, but the pressure would crush normal foams so you need to use super strong (and expensive) syntactic foam materials.

If you can make the pressure hull out of something that has a better strength to weight ratio than steel you can dive deeper without supplemental buoyancy, or use less to go even deeper. Titanium (and carbon fibre) also have the advantage that they don't rust in sea water.

Here's a paper discussing titanium hulls: https://cdn.ymaws.com/titanium...
https://cdn.ymaws.com/titanium...

Comment Re: seafloor carbon-fiber cannoli (Score 1) 111

While stuff like that does happen, the big reason we have regulations is indeed because the value the free market places on lives is not what we'd like it to be. There are lots of cases where companies were perfectly able to pay out settlements. The Ford Pinto case is the classic example of a company specifically choosing the expense of settling lawsuits over the expense of fixing a dangerous product.

When I was a teenager the local autobody guy who'd just informed me my first car wasn't worth repairing noted "they're always worth more to us than they are to anybody else." Goes even more so for lives.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you are good, you will be assigned all the work. If you are real good, you will get out of it.

Working...