Would this "simple" solution be secure against RF scanners?

Hi,

So are these adds only when one has SiriusXM subscription - or only when not?
Are they general adds or specifically to subscribe for SiriusXM?
Do they show up when using other apps, not even when touching SiriusXM (this seems like true, but wanted to make sure)?

Anyway, that is a pretty disturbing trend, however I think a more important is to address "subscription based hardware features" (like e.g. seat heating) first.

It's not only one side, that is why I watch "by definition" both sides of the story to make up my mind - the problem is that the media are subjected to the sponsored propaganda, but the good side is that the US still has both sides of the story, EU not so much.

Yes, you're right - there is the other side of the "internet coin", but I think the issues you mentioned should be addressed by parents and education not censorship, at least the rules have to be crisp and not depending on interpretation.

Banks got just pure cash, car manufactures (some) got cash in exchange for ownership, which they later payed off, oil, steel, shipyards and food get subsidies or law is enacted to protect them from any foreign competition - any way necessary is used to guarantee US independence.

Times are different now - it is no longer what it used to be after the fall of the iron curtain, the tensions only rising and chips nowadays are even more important than oil in the last century, as one cannot start producing chips "overnight".

Yes indeed, would vote you up, but have already commented here.

US I think is the only place with enshrined freedom of speech into the Constitution and still pressure is mounting - and I do not single out any side here.
EU is as usual "protecting" and the UK full speed ahead into "V for Vendetta" in order not to "offend".

Yes, like Google did in China.

True, and OpenAI has Microsoft behind with all their cloud infrastructure and the client base (including GitHub) - sooner or later they'll become part of MS corporation in my opinion.

Let's be honest, it's been happening for "ages" for any strategic industry, like food production, oil, steel, shipyards, banking and the list can go on - now with the worries about Taiwan, high end chip manufacturing is a reasonable thing to protect - let's not get paranoid.

Do they have the same launch site for Soyuz and Proton?
How about the Vostochny Cosmodrome, it was operational wasn't it?

It's indeed tempting to have such conclusions, however the linked publication summary mentions control over ownership of other devices, so as long as the statistical analysis are sound it would really indicate that smartphones ownership is dangerous for young kids - but is it actually the device or an easy access to the social media I would ask - because the summary doesn't distinguish in the described methodology.

" ... Models were adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic variables, ownership of other devices, pubertal development, and parental monitoring."

Because a good conman can always fool gullible and facts and the truth is less appealing than propaganda for the enough most.

The link is interactive, so to see licenses one has to select the year (2024) and click on "launch licenses" - the Vulcan license number: LLO 23-128

Could you provide some evidence, because AFAIK any launch has to have a license and only if the launch is for DoD or NASA it doesn't require FAA approval (though historically they have never been in conflict), and the second Vulcan launch was with ULA as a customer ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), so it was a certification launch but not with DoD as a customer, hence would automatically fall for FAA jurisdiction.

I followed the link, and I found (as I expected) that the ULA second Vulcan launch was licensed by FAA, how about that?
https://www.faa.gov/data_resea...

I do not think so, Hera is the ESA mission and SpaceX is doing a taxi service, ergo a commercial launch, ergo the FAA authority.
The issue is with FAA giving exception due to the second stage not going through reentry (as many already posted here).