You seem to be confusing "part-time job" with "minimum wage" and "non-skilled labor" with "young, drug-addled, and incompetent". Funny how all those "non-skilled" jobs have suddenly become "essential" in the last 8 months...

Part-time jobs employ part-time workers as well as numerous under-employed workers who work multiple jobs to make ends meet. This includes young people, students, people needing something to do short term, and also full-time employees who require additional income because our current min. wage @ 40 hrs/week doesn't house, clothe, medicate, and feed a family (let alone an individual). Regardless, a part-time employee should receive the same benefits as their full-time counterpart, pro-rated to reflect their hours. And those full-time benefits should be enough to cover housing, clothing, preventative medicine, and food. Something like a "minimum" payable "wage" necessary to afford those things.

I'd happily pay $2.30 for a cheeseburger if it meant my neighbors earned a livable wage + medical benefits. We're already subsidizing a livable wage + medical benefits through corporate welfare. Why not cut out the middle-men and give it directly to the people?

This is +5, Insightful? Really?

Please link me to a ride-sharing service that offers profit sharing, benefits, 401k, etc. It's not like Uber is forced to not give those benefits. They can offer better compensation, or they can go out of business.

You think corporations should make more, but the labor force disagrees. That means you are wrong.

Siri, show me eugenics.

All this and more can be found in the 2017 edition of The Anarchists Cookbook!

I find pornographic films to be more analogous to business. Because no matter the industry, somebody is always trying to f*c you.

Does it matter why a company actually adopts open software? Isn't the fact that it's being used more important? Also, what's the harm in a business finding that open software is a way to get an edge on the competition?