Re:Please, please, please... (Score 1)

unfortunately if you don't think the semantic web requires laying to rest, you need to get back and start studying up on knowledge representation (Kent's a good place to start). Even people involved with its development realise the SW fundamentally flawed and that ternary relations are insufficient to model informational relationships at the logical level. Kill it off, and start again with actual theory instead of embaressing adhocracy. (Every good coder knows that the first version is always a prototype anyhow).