Comment Re:chicken or egg? (Score 2) 269
Comment replying to undo misclicked mod (Score 1) 148
Comment Re:This isn't that hard to explain.. (Score 1) 215
Comment Re:Seriously... (Score 1) 116
Comment Re:Let the consumer choose (Score 0) 347
What Google and Samsung should do, is make their products highly customizable. Allow the user to design their own product. Want rounded corners instead of sharp ones? There you go. Want a black border around your screen? No problem. Want an aluminum case? Want some fruit depicted on the back of your device? Etc. That way, they avoid litigation, and give the users exactly what they want. Everybody happy, (except maybe Apple, who wants to give us all the same hamburger, like McDonald's does.)
Sure, and Samsung could claim to be a sovereign citizen. They could then send Apple a letter, informing them that reading the letter constitutes the agreement of a contract whereby Apple will pay Samsung $10,000,000 in gold coins and Infowars Dollars.*
* I am not a lawyer.
Journal Journal: Karma's a bitch
Seems my Karma has become so terrible I can only post twice a day. This is a test to see if I still write in the journal
Comment Re:I'd sign up in a second if I lived in .au (Score -1) 66
Comment Re:how 'bout some gun control... (Score 1, Insightful) 1706
Comment Re:is it real (Score 2) 1198
Comment Re:Don't panic. This is only a test. (Score 1) 178
Comment Re:For Christ's Sake, Just Get A Big USB Drive (Score 2) 189
Comment What does she want? (Score 2) 370
There are plenty other sites she can visit for her modern web experience. Want dynamic stuff that breaks traditional browsing paradigms? Sure, you got it. How about over-use of flash and other crap? Coming right up, albeit in smaller amounts these days due to anyone with an ounce of sense blocking Flash content except for sites where it'll be used to provide the service being sought - not just advertising or "artistic" flair. Want Javascript/AJAX stuff that'll send your cycles climbing, and give you something that looks nice but is in fact far less useful that the old site? Sure, and why not come to Slashdot to see an example of how geeks can build a UI to solve a problem that never really existed - all while neglecting proper support for unicode and touch screen devices. Did anyone at Geeknet not even try browsing Slashdot on a touchscreen device? Trying to adjust filtering is a pain, and why is there an option at the bottom to opt out of the mobile version if it doesn't work? God I hate mobile versions of sites - particularly when I can't opt out of them.
Ironically The Atlantic reminds me of Wikipedia design. Nice simple layout that doesn't detract from the content. Wikipedia works because its layout doesn't get in my way (except maybe when they fuck around "mobile friendly" layouts.
Comment Re:Windows 8 (Score 2) 485
Comment Re:Misinformed Title (Score 0) 161
JC