Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Experienced this (Score 3, Informative) 37

The last flight I took, (back in 2019) had something like this going on. A strong chemical fume coming from the air vents for the entire flight, very harsh, like an industrial solvent. Gave me a hell of a headache, and made it impossible to sleep on the flight, which was unfortunate, as it was a late flight, and I had a 4 hour drive to make on landing.

I left a feedback on the airline website about it, but never heard anything back from them on it.

Comment Re:That AI backlash is here... (Score 2) 134

I’ve been thinking about this, and have sort of come to the conclusion that; deliberately or not, these AI companies have poisoned the well when it comes to knowledge and information on the internet.
Not long ago, it took a great deal of time, a fair bit of skill, and fairly costly software to fake a photograph. It took movie studio budgets to fake video. Now, in virtually no time at all, random people can make ‘convincing’ AI generated pictures and video to back up outrageous lies, and spread them far and wide across social media.
Remember the near-panic someone created with the AI pics of Trump being arrested? Those pics were briefly circulated with the breathtaking claim that Trump was shot by police while resisting arrest.
Both sides of social media were foaming at the mouth for a minute before it all got debunked, but the main takeaway is, if a random dipshit with a midjourney account can start a shitstorm like that, it makes it pretty hard to trust *anything* online now.
“Pics or it didn’t happen” no longer proves anything, and as other posters here have noted, 50% of the output of AI in their workflow is crap and wrong and needs correcting, and with AI being baked into every popular search engine, the fountain of human knowledge has essentially been pissed in.
Now, the question remains, did they piss in the fountain on purpose, or were they just drunk on their own hubris, and didn’t realize they were pissing in the fountain.

Comment Security nightmare (Score 4, Insightful) 198

No one mentions the hellish security nightmare QR codes are. Hell, the articles I’ve read pretty much can be summed up with the advice “Never scan a QR code.”
The fact it is so trivial to print out a custom QR code with god knows what encoded in it, and slap it over any public facing QR code should be enough to make anyone second guess scanning one.

Comment Re:Know when there were even more sun- (Score 2) 175

Not just coal and bunker fuel emissions, our capability to do *anything* about wildfires has dramatically increased. We actively work to put out most wildfires, whereas, less than 150 years ago, any forest fire that started pretty much burned until the weather put it out, or it burned into a sparse enough area that it ran out of fuel. I’m guessing that the planet has the cleanest air, particulate wise, it has had since the last extinction level event cleared up.

Comment Fun anecdote (Score 1) 54

By hilarious happenstance, I happen to know that it is *really difficult* to tranquilize ostriches, a problem I expect extends to emus. Years ago, a local bar kept a pair of ostriches in a big pen in the empty lot next door as a kind of tourist attraction/sideshow. One day, one of them escaped. We were in town that day visiting our good friend, the local veterinarian, so we got a front row seat to the show when the bar owner showed up asking the vet to use his tranquilizer gun to capture the ostrich. Turns out, those big feathers make a dandy dart-proof vest; and a good number of doses of tranquilizer were wasted, you could see the dart hit, and bounce off spraying its payload in the air, rather than sticking in the bird.
Eventually, the ostrich got bored of his freedom and returned to his pen on his own, much to everyones relief.
Anyways, I suspect that one would have the same trouble darting an emu.

Comment Re:Work for minimum wage (Score 1) 90

I think he was more pointing out the sad societal phenomenon that is the inverse relationship between wages and how destructive the job is to the body.
I did 10 years in retail, and am glad I got out when I did, my joints are already half trashed. 10-12 hour days walking 30k steps on concrete floors moving tens of thousands of 50lb cases takes its toll on the body.
In a magical utopia, a job that uses up the body like that would compensate the worker fabulously, to make up for the wear and tear.
But instead, the best paying jobs are ones that can be done by barely lifting a finger.
Can we change this? Probably not, it is built into the entire fabric of society.

Comment Re:Why do companies do things? (Score 1) 149

I worked in a grocery store for 10 years, ending a couple years ago. It was a small local chain with about 10 mid-size stores. It took a 3 person crew of full-time workers to keep price tags and sales tags up to date, in just my store. Literally, 3 people, there entire 8 hour shift consisted of scanning tags with a reader to see if they matched the price info on file, and pulling, printing, and replacing out of date tags; along with putting up ‘special sale’ tags, and removing sale tags.
I can only imagine the amount of work this must be in *big* stores like walmart or kroger or the like. I can see the cost savings just in printer toner and tags being enough to justify the switch to electronic tags, not even mentioning the labor costs.
We would go through hundreds of pounds of paper stickers and plastic tag backs a month, and like I said, we were a small operation compared to these.

Comment Re:Makes sense (Score 1) 140

Pretty much!
I worked 10 years in retail, and if I was stocking, I could work a 10-12 hour shift with no problems, because I was constantly moving. (30k+ steps a day). But if I got stuck running a register, I my body would be in agony in a few hours, even with the ‘anti-fatigue mats’. My back, legs, and feet would be screaming and no amount of fidgeting in place would relieve it. Actually moving around is key.

Comment Re: The Superconducting Super Collider problem (Score 1) 111

I think the investment is way larger than we might guess. Entire old power plants have been bought and brought back online to fuel the ai craze. There is talk of re-starting 3-mile island, just to power server farms. These are *huge* investments that reach further into the ‘normal’ economy than the .com era ever did. The Contractors, engineers, and workers involved in these massive projects will be left holding the bag when the ai craze flops, and that will have far-reaching impacts.

Comment Re:The Superconducting Super Collider problem (Score 1) 111

I think you are on the right line of thought; the AI bubble can only go so far before investors demand some tangible results from the billions/trillions they have been throwing at it. I’m really hoping the AI craze does not tank the world economy when it pops like the .com bubble.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember to say hello to your bank teller.

Working...