
Yeah but how many *brand new* XP machines did you buy that ran like crap? I suspect the answer is "none" because Microsoft's recommendations to hardware manufacturers were realistic (128 meg recommended). Now compare that to Vista:
My brother bought himself a brand-new Vista machine, with 512 meg of RAM, and it's as slow as a snail through molasses. Microsoft gave the hardware manufacturers bad advice when they said 512 meg was enough space.
128 Meg for XP actually does run like crap. I have an old machine with 256 Meg of ram that keeps resorting to the swap file every time I have moer than one app open at a time. The fact is every operating system has had the same critisisms of bloatware, power hungry, bad compatibility etc. Then after a few years, everyone forgets how much they used to hate it. Vista may have been a little worse than normal but it does always happen.
Their idea of an offer you can't refuse is an offer... and you'd better not refuse.