Comment Possible reason for absence of destructive exploit (Score 1) 76
A destructive exploit of this vulnerability doesn't seem to have materialized yet, which is a "good thing".
I believe that the reason for this stems from the fact that one cannot remain truly anonymous while delivering the "package".
If an individual were to post a tainted link to a destructive exploit, the source of that link would act as a very large "finger" pointing back to the perp. Simply contact the web server administrator and follow the bread crumb trail. If the admin refuses to cooperate, apply sufficient persuasive pressure until he/she does.
Still, it's probably best to do your recreational surfing under a disposable user account until this hole is buttoned up.
I believe that the reason for this stems from the fact that one cannot remain truly anonymous while delivering the "package".
If an individual were to post a tainted link to a destructive exploit, the source of that link would act as a very large "finger" pointing back to the perp. Simply contact the web server administrator and follow the bread crumb trail. If the admin refuses to cooperate, apply sufficient persuasive pressure until he/she does.
Still, it's probably best to do your recreational surfing under a disposable user account until this hole is buttoned up.
