REDiculous as opposed to GREENiculous? (how do you even ignore spell check these days, its built into your browser)

Wow. You have a great point. I'm going to go sue them for my $9 back. Wait, the courts would want to see us work it out together before wasting their time.. I'm going to submit a chargeback for my $9. There. That shows them. WHO ELSE IS COMING WITH ME?

antibodies protect you from the initial onset of the virus. antibodies target the spike protein so SARS-nCOV-2 doesn't even reach the ACE2 receptors. t-cells fight not only the spike protein but all aspects of this coronavirus.

..like a turbocharger but for excess energy. interesting concept

The research in case anyone is interested

People love to throw out the herd immunity word, but forget that your flu immunity does not carry over to the next year. Personally Im waiting for the 2021 edition

Please don't say stupid things like this. Masks alone provide very little protection to you AND others. Masks with filters provide GREAT protection to yourself AND others. You cannot say a mask does not provide protection to others. Because the simple act of one going into public is reducing the protection of others. You are doing what you can, considering the situation. A mask with no filtration is better than no mask at all.

So you are technically correct as written, but you can simply cut apart a cloth shopping bag and you have KN95-level filtration that is a net benefit for you and others.

SARS-nCov-2 came out end of December. BOTH Davos AND G7 happened prior to Jan 30. If you don't believe all of the world leaders knew about it then let me sell you a beautiful bridge overlooking an impressive skyline.

Laser pointers look legal too until you use them in a lethal manner. You know what else doesn't show up on a shaky cell phone chickpea camera recorded at night? A laser pointer. Thus you have no freaking clue that they were doing nothing illegal.

Oh How I can't wait for deepfakes.

why not list out what a lawyer would need to do to be successful and allow individuals to sue google in small claims court themselves. the sheer number of cases would draw attention to google and case law (in the event google loses) would set a horrible precedent for them. not to mention it would overwhelm them and would actually put a dent into google's revenue.

kind of like that guys website that fights parking tickets for you, a point click small claims court checklist to sue google over this would gain traction very quickly...

This is happening in the industry at such precedence that it is amazing it is allowed. Today if you are not "playing with the team" they simply let you fall. Of course the severance is usually well pampered, which puts the zipper on everyone's mouth. The fact that she has a platform to make this aware may tip the legal scales in corporations that do not provide distinct goals and metrics that show failure to improve. $100 this will be settled out of court.