Indeed. LLMs can also not break out of competently done encapsulation and they cannot get into competently secured IT systems. This whole thing stinks of having been set up, by both parties.
You obviously zero clue how AI works. We're well passed basic LLM prediction engines at this point.
Why do you believe those "AI detectors" are accurate? The past evaluations I've seen came to a different conclusion.
OP said the following:
If you do not possess your own ability to discern human vs. AI generated writing, you are welcome to submit it to any of the many "ai detectors" online.
I simply followed his advice, which proved he was full of shit.
No idea whether the author actually exists (nor do I see how it matters), but the text is either wholly or mostly AI generated, with all the usual stylistic hallmarks thereof.
False. I don't see any evidence of that.
If you do not possess your own ability to discern human vs. AI generated writing, you are welcome to submit it to any of the many "ai detectors" online.
False. ZeroGPT says this is Human generated text. You need a life.
The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.
