Comment Re:Vigilante Justice (Score 1) 182
What is a good idea and what is legal are two entirely separate things. You are allowed to defend your property with non-lethal force. Whether you should is not something my post attempted to address.
What is a good idea and what is legal are two entirely separate things. You are allowed to defend your property with non-lethal force. Whether you should is not something my post attempted to address.
That is not true. You are allowed to use degrees of non-lethal force (such as a fist) to defend your property.
From the Wikipedia article on self-defense:
"The ownership and possession of property confer a certain right to defend that possession, [including] a defense of it which results in an assault and battery, and that which results in the destruction of the means used to invade and interfere with that possession."[4]
People v. Kane, 131 N.Y. 111 (142 N.Y. 366, 37 N.E. 104)
For example : http://www.nzfortress.co.nz/forum/showthread.php?t=20768
First to file means that if have a working model and you talked to someone about it, they could get the patent.
Changing to first to file doesn't change the fact that only the inventor can file a patent. If you could show in court that your work was used to file the patent, you would win it back. Note that this is different from the case where someone else independently invents the same thing and files first.
Ernest asks Frank how long he has been working for the company. "Ever since they threatened to fire me."