I think people defiantly compare flight time to, say, taking a train or car. But do customers really care that much about flight time? it's not like that's a big selling point when you chose your flight.
If your flight from new york to LA took an extra half hour and cost 30% less, i don't think anybody would complain
- yes Adamantly YES. - claustrophobic people, people whom get airsick , people whom dislike flying, Smokers- YES we DO care about how long we're locked in that flying brick, i'd honestly pay 30% more for 30% less time locked in there (im a smoker, i get airsick and i generally don't like flying) It already takes me 2 hours to get thru the airport, drink 3-4 drinks at the bar so im actually willing to get on the plane, and then add 45 minutes if i need to hunt down the only smoking lounge in an airport (like denver or atlanta) , then add the hour or two after we land to locate my baggage and get out. 30% flight time longer, sure , knockout the security lines, and let me smoke in flight , and i dont care if it takes a week, but currently No way no how, i already drive if its less than 800 miles because its plain cheaper, more comfortable, no GED-equipped minimum wage TSA agent goin thru my underwear, and almost as fast (12 hour drive time or 4 hours in the airports and 3 in the air).
The Universe is populated by stable things. -- Richard Dawkins