Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Privacy

Can We Abandon Confidentiality For Google Apps? 480

An anonymous reader writes "I provide IT services for medium-sized medical and law practices. Lately I have been getting a lot of feedback from doctors and lawyers who use gmail at home and believe that they can run a significant portion of their practice IT on Google Apps. From a support standpoint, I'd be happy to chuck mail/calendar service management into the bin and let them run with gmail, but for these businesses, there is significant legal liability associated with the confidentiality of their communications and records (e.g., HIPAA). For those with high-profile celebrity clients, simply telling them 'Google employees can read your stuff' will usually end the conversation right there. But for smaller practices, I often get a lot of push-back in the form of 'What's wrong with trusting Google?' and 'Google's not interested in our email/calendar.' Weighing what they see as a tiny legal risk against the promise of Free IT Stuff(TM) becomes increasingly lopsided given the clear functionality / usability / ubiquity that they experience when using Google at home. So my question to the Slashdot community is: Are they right? Is it time for me to remove the Tin Foil Hat on the subject of confidentiality and stop resisting the juggernaut that is Google? If not, what is the best way to clarify the confidentiality issues for these clients?"

Comment Create your own (Score 1) 503

If the EU doesn't like the way the US is handling ICANN, then they can go through the expense to build their own Internet. When they do, lets make sure they also take posession of the .ru and .cn domains as well, just for giggles. That way when they start whining about how hard it is to control nations outside their jurisdiction, it might sink in to why the one nation/singular control doctrine has worked for so long.

Comment Re:Hmm.. (Score 1) 1246

I could be wrong in this, but in some countries having an education is a privilege - not a right or required by law. If we extended that thought to the public education system here in the US, then the teachers could then focus on the students who truly wanted to learn. Face it - not everybody wants to be educated, and the world needs janitors and ditch diggers and other unskilled labor too. I was taught growing up that I had a choice - I could work with my back or work with my brain. Since my dad was a general contractor, I got to "experience" the work with my back and decided I needed to get the education. (I have an M.S. in software engineering) The problem I see there is that the teacher's unions would drop a brick as then we wouldn't need all the deadweight they bring to the table, and those teachers that actually can teach would be employed while those that can't can join the students that didn't want to be taught in the first place. As for my kids, I had them in private school. However, private schools now have the same problems as public schools with the voucher system that's in place. Now we homeschool because A) We know the teacher personally, B) Our "student" gets one on one help when he has problems grasping a subject, C) He can progress at his own pace instead of having to learn at the rate of the slowest person in the class and D) If we need to use corporal punishment, we could. When we take him into public or he attends a homeshool league function, he is a respectful gentleman unlike the unruly brats in the traditional school system (And we find the "unsocialized" homeschooler jokes/arguments hilarious. Those that don't homeschool have no clue how much quality "socialization" goes on - but I'll leave that for another discussion)

Comment Re:Stalemate. (Score 1) 580

I think the point of the shareholders is that instead of investing in R&D thats going nowhere should instead be paid out as dividends. It's either that or one of shareholders actually tried to use .Net or an application based on .Net and realized what a piece of crap the platform really is.

Slashdot Top Deals

What the scientists have in their briefcases is terrifying. -- Nikita Khruschev

Working...