Individuals with degrees argue with researchers about the nature of death and the variety of fears one can have towards death. Annoyed researchers check "no."

N+1!

It's not different than arguing with creationists, Richard Hoagland, 9/11 truthers, or holocaust deniers. They've made up their minds, the facts be damned.

Are you talking about the supporters or the opponents of global warming?

OMG!!

Perhaps I missed something here.

That's the point.

You should also not vote for Red or Blue.

Jupiter already makes the sun wobble. 18-20x larger would probably not be good. http://tycho.bgsu.edu/~laird/cp_images/wobble.html

Sharks with bent friggin laser beams on their head!

Does it run Linux?

Occam's Razor is not a test - It is a postulate that is not necessarily true - IE the simplest answer to life, the universe and everything being: God.

Modern science considers data first and tries to apply Occam's Razor to find the simplest solution given the set of data. By itself, Occam's Razor is an argument for God, not science.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

+2 Karma to the first person who obtains, and releases into the Microsoft retail store, a living anthropomorphic paper clip with disembodied eyes. I know there is no God, because there was Clippy.

They just need to smoke more pot!

And how many people have been successfully prosecuted for these "illegal" downloads?

I think you're comparing the standouts of the past to the masses of today. I think if you compare the appropriate groups you'll see there have been some steps forward and some steps back.

Let's party like we don't know any better!