If it becomes a problem the companies could just fire everyone and hire from the 30 million unemployed that need work...
Heh give up state unemployment + the federal $600/wk for a job that only pays ~$500/wk. Yea real smart there.....
And half that of seasonal influenza, BTW.
In ~1/6th the time
That being said, the person selling the water for thousands of dollars is liable because he was intentionally ripping me off because there is a product I needed, which he could had sold at a much lower price, and would had sold it without that temporarily extenuating circumstances.
This happens all the time.... you buy something at X price and then you sell it at Y price but now you need to buy replacement product for X+Z where Z>Y so how much new inventory can you get w/o "gouging" the customer?
Every upload was done voluntarily. No one's rights were impacted.
Except it was NOT the accused subject that uploaded his DNA it was a relative that uploaded their DNA. That right there speaks volumes... you get "ratted" out by someone else's ignorance. I can control my privacy but this is out of my control.
It's not the number that's being copyrighted. It's the method of generating the number which is trying to be protected. That is we're looking not at the result, but the implementation.
So I rip a CD and run it through my algorithm I have now generated a comparable number but according to copyright law I have violated copyright.
I bought my house roughly 10 years ago, now it's worth 3 times the price I paid for it
First rule of investments... It is not worth 3 times what you paid for it till you have the money in the bank from selling it.
Anyone with half a brain is skipping the commercials, using that time to get some food/drink, use the toilet, yell at the kids, channel surfing, or *anything* other than staring at the commercials.
You can't avoid commercials by surfing.... all the stations have synced their commercials so you have no choice but to surf to 'their' commercial.
I didn't watch any of those movies, but I think I once read a book which was printed on paper from a tree which was cut by a logger who uses a phone whose OS contains sourcecode partly written on a computer running Ubuntu.
So I guess 2015 IS the year of Ubuntu on the desktop afterall.
Only if the book was setting on your desktop.
Someday somebody has got to decide whether the typewriter is the machine, or the person who operates it.