lmy ittle big booby /bin/rm -rf * trap is 0 yo

little big booby /bin/rm -rf * trap

LOL A1 High Stakes Saucerz for the intert00bz
https://www.perplexity.ai/sear...

I am a proud American Citizen of Indian origin going thru my 25th year in the US (ex Georgia Tech + MIT startups).

And I have witnessed greedy capitalist American industries selling their soul, laying of locals, outsourcing everything abroad, with no remorse.

WTF

I also blame my divorce on greedy American capitalism gone woke+broke (ex-Akamai, etc).

Insightful comment about the layoff machine from https://m.slashdot.org/story/4... : "The social costs with these mass job losses are paid in divorces, broken homes, lower achievement rates of single parent raised children, increased drug use, increased jail rates, increased suicide rates, much lower child birth rates, etc."

I am a proud American Citizen of Indian origin going thru my 25th year in the US (ex Georgia Tech + MIT startups).

And I have witnessed greedy capitalist American industries selling their soul, outsourcing everything abroad, with no remorse.

WTF

I also blame my divorce on greedy American capitalism gone woke+broke (ex-Akamai, etc).

I also blame my divorce on greedy American capitalism gone broke (ex-Akamai).

....and loved your joke.

My 25th year in the US (ex Georgia Tech + MIT startups.

And I have witnessed greedy capitalist American industries selling their soul, outsourcing everything abroad, with no remorse.

WTF

https://swarajyamag.com/cultur...

Superfood for thought

The latest Superman film replaces timeless heroism with thinly veiled political activism in a Gaza-style conflict, turning a childrenâ(TM)s icon into a mouthpiece for global progressive narratives.
Superman is back. But he no longer just leaps tall buildings. In the 2025 reboot helmed by James Gunn, the Man of Steel lands not in Kansas or Krypton, but squarely in the middle of a geopolitical firestorm. Audiences expecting mythic heroism have instead found themselves watching a not-so-subtle allegory of the Israel-Palestine conflict, masked in the language of science fiction but framed with unmistakable moral cues.

At the heart of the film lies a fictional conflict between Boravia, a wealthy, high-tech, Western-aligned state, and Jarhanpur, its impoverished neighbour ravaged by displacement, airstrikes and drone warfare. Refugee camps, grieving brown civilians and white-skinned Boravian troops evoke an uncanny resemblance to footage from war-torn Gaza.

Viewers have rightly asked: is this a Superman film or a sermon in disguise?

That question matters because Superman is not just a character. He is a cultural icon forged across nearly a century. He belongs not to one nation or ideology, but to every child who has ever believed that power must serve principle, not politics. When even he is co-opted, what sacred ground remains?

The Corruption of Superman: From Ãoebermensch to Activist

Superman was never just a superhero. He was an ideal. He is what many children like me aspired to be. He represented what humanity could aspire to if blessed with godlike power but raised with human decency. Kal-El, the orphan from a dying planet, was not just a metaphor for immigration or alienation. He was a parable of strength constrained by morality, of immense power guided by humility and love.

Across decades, Superman has symbolised the pinnacle of Western ideals, carrying echoes of Moses (sent in a basket from a doomed homeland), Christ (a saviour raised among mortals who sacrifices himself), and Nietzscheâ(TM)s Ãoebermensch (the one who rises above herd morality, not in cruelty but with purpose). He was the bridge between myth and modernity, between power and restraint.

The 2025 film reduces all of that to political activism. It does not even pretend to be neutral. There is no ambiguity, no moral tension, no âoegrey zoneâ to navigate.

Superman, alongside Green Lantern, Hawkgirl and Mister Terrific, explicitly fights on behalf of Jarhanpur (modelled on Palestine) to protect it from invasions by Boravia (modelled on Israel), an ally of the United States. This is not storytelling. It is scripted activism in the guise of a superhero saga.

The symbolism is unmistakable. Many shots look as though they were taken directly from the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is not even subtle. It is cinematic dogma. Superman is no longer a universal symbol of moral restraint. He is now a political actor in a postmodern morality play, where the villain wears Western armour and the hero delivers justice through selective compassion.

This is not an accidental choice. It is ideological weaponisation. The film hijacks the emotional power of childhood icons and redirects it toward a specific geopolitical narrative, one that flatters Western progressives while vilifying their historical allies. Superman does not represent the best of humanity anymore. He represents the anxieties of elite screenwriters who believe activism should come disguised as myth.

This is not heroic clarity. This is narrative conscription. Superman and his allies do not fight for truth and justice in the abstract. They fight for the approved causes of the cultural Left, and children watching are told, without nuance, who is good, who is evil, and what side they must support.

What this film offers is not evolution. It is erosion by design. A deliberate attempt to overwrite heroic mythology with the language of grievance, guilt and geopolitical guilt-tripping.

The Global Woke Complex and the Colonisation of Childrenâ(TM)s Cinema

What is happening to Superman is not an isolated event. It is part of a broader phenomenon. Over the past decade, Hollywood has steadily transformed itself from a storytelling machine into a moral factory. The new assembly line does not produce dreams. It mass-produces dogma. From Barbie to The Marvels, Snow White to The Little Mermaid, childrenâ(TM)s films have become delivery systems for progressive orthodoxy, dressed up in nostalgia and sparkle.

The formula is familiar by now. Start with a beloved franchise. Strip it of its original moral and cultural roots. Inject modern political messaging, usually centred around race, gender, colonial guilt or anti-Western narratives. Then market it as âoeboldâ, âoeinclusiveâ and âoenecessaryâ. If audiences push back, dismiss them as bigots or reactionaries who âoejust do not understandâ.

But childrenâ(TM)s cinema is not a battleground for abstract theory. It is where moral imagination is shaped. It is where children first learn about courage, compassion, truth and sacrifice, not through lectures, but through symbolism, stakes and stories.

When these stories become ideological vehicles, the line between entertainment and indoctrination blurs. The child is no longer treated as a thinking being, but as a cultural subject to be reprogrammed. When Superman, Disney princesses and Marvel icons are all rewritten to reflect the anxieties of modern American academia, the target is not the character. It is the viewer.

This is not diversity. It is deracination. It is not empowerment. It is enculturation.

By embedding adult political frameworks into childhood mythologies, Hollywood has effectively colonised the minds of the next generation and disguised it as âoerepresentationâ.

The Real Problem: Not That Itâ(TM)s Political But That It Pretends Not To Be

Let us be clear: political cinema is not the problem. In fact, it is essential. A thriving society must be able to tell stories that provoke, unsettle and challenge dominant narratives. Films like The Kashmir Files or Article 15 do exactly that, without apology. They do not hide their intent. They confront the audience directly. You may agree with them or not, but you know exactly where they stand.

Even a hypothetical Palestine Files, if made with sincerity and accountability, deserves a space in the public square. Because real political cinema is declarative, not deceptive. It seeks to spark debate, not smuggle ideology through allegory.

The problem with Superman (2025) is not that it is political. It is that it disguises politics as parable, activism as myth. It does not invite debate. It embeds its conclusions in imagery designed to bypass the rational filter. The cities may be fictional, the names invented, but the moral cues are real, loaded and unmistakable.

This is not storytelling. It is narrative laundering, using the trust we place in iconic characters to deliver politicised messaging that would not survive on its own.

James Gunn insists the film is not about the Middle East. That is irrelevant. Because in cultural warfare, intent is secondary to impact. When the film echoes headlines from Gaza, when its villains are dressed like Western soldiers and its victims resemble displaced refugees, no amount of creative denial can stop the associations from forming.

This is the sleight of hand: cloak ideology in fantasy, and no one will notice the ideology, only the fantasy. Until it is too late.

What India Must Learn and Guard Against

What Hollywood is doing to Superman today, it will attempt on Hanuman tomorrow. The cultural subversion of childhood heroes is not just a Western crisis. It is a global contagion. And India, as both a civilisational state and a rising creative power, must treat it as such.

We have already seen the early signs. Streaming platforms filled with âoemodern retellingsâ of epics that twist dharmic heroes into caricatures. Schoolbooks that flatten sacred stories into moral equivalence. Childrenâ(TM)s cartoons that dilute Indic narratives to fit imported frameworks of oppression and intersectionality.

The same ideological machinery that turned Superman into a confused, conflicted figure of moral relativism will eventually turn Indian deities into self-doubting, apologetic tropes if we allow it.

To Indian parents: be vigilant about what your children consume. Not just in terms of violence or language, but in terms of the values being implanted. Ask not just âoeis this appropriate?â but ask âoeis this ours?â

To Indian creators: do not outsource your imagination to the guilt complexes of the West. Tell stories rooted in dharma, not derivative shame. Our heroes do not need redemption arcs written by Columbia University. They need to be reaffirmed, not rewritten.

Amar Chitra Katha does not need to become âoeinclusiveâ. It needs to remain authentic. Hanuman does not need to be a symbol of climate justice or gender neutrality. He needs to remain what he is: a timeless icon of devotion, courage and power used rightly.

This is not a call for isolation. It is a call for rootedness. Hollywoodâ(TM)s mistake is not that it changed. It is that it forgot where it came from. India must not do the same.

Final Take

Superman (2025) is not just a film. It is a flashing cultural warning light. A franchise that once embodied hope, restraint and the quiet dignity of doing the right thing has been converted into a lecture in cape and spandex. There is no wonder left. Just weary messaging.

The tragedy is not that Superman is being politicised. It is that he is being conscripted quietly and insidiously into a war of narratives where the audience is not invited to think, but conditioned to absorb. Where the child, once uplifted by heroism, is now burdened with ideology.

A story that once taught us to rise above ourselves now asks us to wallow in someone elseâ(TM)s moral confusion.

Let political cinema be political. Let The Kashmir Files, Article 15, and even a Palestine Files come forth, if they must. Let them be explicit, confrontational and intellectually honest. That is how democracy breathes.

But let childhood remain sacred.

Do not put Gaza in Metropolis. Do not make Superman a symbol of guilt. Do not turn every fable into a fight, every myth into a manifesto. Because when you strip away the clarity of heroes, you do not produce better citizens. You produce confused ones, trained not in courage, but in compliance.

In the end, when symbols of strength are hollowed out and repurposed to carry fashionable guilt, we do not get justice. We get propaganda.

And no child should be asked to wear that cape.

did you rtfa

rtfa

but it should not be repeated.

hence the awareness campaign

https://www.perplexity.ai/sear...

describe in extreme detail failed USA recycle policies and plastic overuse. meanwhile India has successfully banned single use plastics for years now. e
g. McDonalds there and malls use better utensils.

## Americaâ(TM)s Failed Recycling Policies and Plastic Overuse

### The Scale of Plastic Overuse in the USA compare to worls most populous democracy India

https://www.perplexity.ai/sear...

describe in extreme detail failed USA recycle policies and plastic overuse. meanwhile India has successfully banned single use plastics for years now. e
g. McDonalds there and malls use better utensils.

## Americaâ(TM)s Failed Recycling Policies and Plastic Overuse

### The Scale of Plastic Overuse in the USA compare to worls most populous democracy India

https://www.perplexity.ai/sear...

describe in extreme detail failed USA recycle policies and plastic overuse. meanwhile India has successfully banned single use plastics for years now. e
g. McDonalds there and malls use better utensils.

## Americaâ(TM)s Failed Recycling Policies and Plastic Overuse

### The Scale of Plastic Overuse in the USA compare to worls most populous democracy India

until warmongering Britishers and Islamist Mughals invaded us Hindu Indians, who are into Yoga, meditation, mathematics, academia, medicine.

Radical Islam is the snake hiding in the grass
Moderate Islam is the grass hiding the snake. Mamdani is a traitor to India+USA, a viper in human clothing, he celebrated the terrorist attacks by Islamic terror rogue nation Pakistan/Pukistan against freedom loving dharmic/democratic/Hindu India and also the 911 attacks against the USA. The Barbaric Islamic invader ShahJahan who hired Hindu laborers to construct the Taj Mahal later cut their hands off so they wouldnt construct another monument like it. https://www.perplexity.ai/sear... deep research muslims and Islam using a tapestry of all data sources possible including but not limited to Islamic invasions of India, Kashmiri Pandit exodus/genocide worse than the Holocaust, Islamic terror attacks 911, Nyc Atracks, 711 Mumbai Attacks.
I am surprised it has taken this long for Western entities to understand this. Dismayed rather https://moderndiplomacy.eu/202...

Read Swami Vivekanandas speech warning against the dangers of religious fundamentalism at tee Parliament of World Religions in 1893
https://www.artic.edu/swami-vi... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
For 67 years (1752-1819 AD), the Afghans ruled over Kashmir & ensured it was the darkest period of Islamic oppression. The reign of terror forced Hindus to migrate, convert to Islam, or be ruthlessly killed. In the end, it's said only 11 Pandit families survived in Kashmir.
Asad Khan was the worst of the oppressors. He would tie up Kashmiri Pandits in grass sacks & drown them in Dal Lake in pairs. For amusement, a jar of excreta was placed on Pandit's head & Muslims pelted the jar with stones till it broke & the Hindu was blinded with filth.
The Pandits, who used to display moustaches proudly, were forced to grow beards. They were forbidden from wearing Turbans, shoes, or Tika (Tilaks) on their foreheads.
Later, Pandits wore exaggerated Tikas & overly long turbans in memory of the tyranny of Pathan times. During the Afghan rule, 'Jazia', the poll tax imposed on Hindus, was revived.
During these days, any Muslim who met a Pandit would jump on his back & take a ride, saying,Ã You are a Brahman & I will mount youÃ. This horrifying phrase still survives as a Kashmiri saying.

    Atta Muhamad Khan & his army were sexual predators who used agents to hunt Brahman girls. So terrified were poor Hindus of their lust that they destroyed their daughterÃ(TM)s beauty by shaving off their heads, cutting off their noses, or disfiguring them to escape from rape.
Kashmiri Pandit wedding customs bear testament to this cruel trauma. On the day of marriage, a male relative is decked out in the same fashion as the bridegroom, who is known as the Pot maharaja, because at any point the Pathans could seize the bridegroom & kidnap the bride.
Asad Khan was succeeded by Madad Khan, who was even more brutal. He bound Hindus in cow leather sacks before drowning them to ensure their faith was violated. They were killed at the same Batta Mazar (Graveyard of Pandits) on Dal Lake, where 37 Kg of Janeu were found.
No wonder the era of Afghan rule over Kashmir is known as a time of brutal tyranny motivated by Islamic fanaticism. Kashmiri Hindus had to suffer intolerable brutality & cruelty under the savage Pathans, who thought no more of cutting off heads than of plucking a flower.
Source:
The Valley of Kashmir - Walter R. Lawrence, Oxford University Press, 1893
https://archive.org/details/in...