The Union was taken, by (the) North
For in this War Between the States, the South may have fought for its sacred honor,
Perhaps, someday, their statues, like Lenins in Russia, will be toppled and melted down; their insignias and battle flags will be desecrated, their war songs tossed into the fire. And then Davis and Lee and Jackson and Forrest, and all the heroes of the South, âoeDixieâ and the Stars and Bars, will once again be truly honored and remembered. The classic comment on that meretricious TV series The Civil War was made by that marvelous and feisty Southern writer Florence King. Asked her views on the series, she replied: I didnt have time to watch The Civil War. Iâ(TM)m too busy getting ready for the next one. In that spirit, I am sure that one day, aided and abetted by Northerners like myself in the glorious copperhead tradition, the South shall rise again.
If we put Senators back under the control of state legislatures, they'll be less influenced by outside money because the state legislatures can yank the leash when these "law makers" stop representing their constituents appropriately. This would make the Citizens United decision less relevant, at least on the Senate side.
Agreed. The Senate was assembled to be the voice of the States, the House to be the voice of the people, repeal the 17th Amendment.
The House reps are another story, (etc.)
Term limits.
And yeah... he could have stayed anonymous if he'd wanted to be kidnapped and hauled off to a black site. Putting his name and face to the news gave the story credibility and staying power. Snowden is the man to thank for the 82% concern about NSA surveillance and the ~60% support for weakening the Patriot Act. True, it's not enough to put an end to their shenanigans and restore reverence for human rights and due process, but it's definitely a setback for the NSA.
^^ This
Snowden's revelations have either hurt or in some cases come close to ruining the business of many US companies. While it is the norm on this forum to assume the worst about large corporations in particular, In many cases companies have suffered damage without collaborating in any way with the NSA that has yet been proven. Cisco for example has been losing sales not because they allowed the NSA to screw around with their equipment but rather because the NSA intercepted their shipments. I don't expect corporations to be reluctant to cooperate with the NSA in future out of some moral idealism, companies will be reluctant to cooperate with the NSA simply because this affair has taught them that cooperating can result in a serious impact on their bottom line and if there is another Snowden that impact might be even worse.
This cannot be disputed. The appearance of collaboration will indeed hurt the bottom line of many private enterprises that have not made it a priority to ensure whatever data they collect is not somehow safeguarded. To me, as a consumer, safeguarded looks like how, for example, StartPage.com communicates how it handles what data they are able to discover for you using their services.
StartPage, and its sister search engine Ixquick, are the only third-party certified search engines in the world that do not record your IP address or track your searches.
There is this sense of resignation among those in my circle, a shrug of "What can I do about it? I need to use my
Parallel lines never meet, unless you bend one or both of them.