Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - How IKEA Patched Shellshock (eweek.com)

jones_supa writes: Magnus Glantz, IT manager at IKEA, revealed that the Swedish furniture retailer has more than 3,500 Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers. With Shellshock, every single one of those servers needed to be patched to limit the risk of exploitation. So how did IKEA patch all those servers? Glantz showed a simple one-line Linux command and then jokingly walked away from the podium stating "That's it, thanks for coming". On a more serious note, he said that it took approximately two and half hours to upgrade their infrastructure to defend against Shellshock. The key was having a consistent approach to system management, which begins with a well-defined Standard Operating Environment (SOE). Additionally, Glantz has defined a lifecycle management plan that describes the lifecycle of how Linux will be used at Ikea for the next seven years.

Comment Re:I hate and despise - but they should still be s (Score 1) 818

http://archive.lewrockwell.com...

The Union was taken, by (the) North ..., from a contractual institution that can either be cleaved to or scrapped, and turned into a divinized entity, which must be worshipped, and which must be permanent, unquestioned, all-powerful. There is no heresy greater, nor political theory more pernicious, than sacralizing the secular. But this monstrous process is precisely what happened when Abraham Lincoln and his northern colleagues made a god out of the Union. If the British forces fought for bad King George, the Union armies pillaged and murdered on behalf of this pagan idol, this âoeUnion,â this Moloch that demanded terrible human sacrifice to sustain its power and its glory.

For in this War Between the States, the South may have fought for its sacred honor, ... . We remember the care with which the civilized nations had developed classical international law. Above all, civilians must not be targeted; wars must be limited. But the North insisted on creating a conscript army, a nation in arms, and broke the 19th-century rules of war by specifically plundering and slaughtering civilians, by destroying civilian life and institutions so as to reduce the South to submission. Shermans infamous March through Georgia was one of the great war crimes, and crimes against humanity, of the past century-and-a-half. Because by targeting and butchering civilians, Lincoln and Grant and Sherman paved the way for all the genocidal honors of the monstrous 20th century. There has been a lot of talk in recent years about memory, about never forgetting about history as retroactive punishment for crimes of war and mass murder. As Lord Acton, the great libertarian historian, put it, the historian, in the last analysis, must be a moral judge. The muse of the historian, he wrote, is not Clio, but Rhadamanthus, the legendary avenger of innocent blood. In that spirit, we must always remember, we must never forget, we must put in the dock and hang higher than Haman, those who, in modern times, opened the Pandoras Box of genocide and the extermination of civilians: Sherman, Grant, and Lincoln.

Perhaps, someday, their statues, like Lenins in Russia, will be toppled and melted down; their insignias and battle flags will be desecrated, their war songs tossed into the fire. And then Davis and Lee and Jackson and Forrest, and all the heroes of the South, âoeDixieâ and the Stars and Bars, will once again be truly honored and remembered. The classic comment on that meretricious TV series The Civil War was made by that marvelous and feisty Southern writer Florence King. Asked her views on the series, she replied: I didnt have time to watch The Civil War. Iâ(TM)m too busy getting ready for the next one. In that spirit, I am sure that one day, aided and abetted by Northerners like myself in the glorious copperhead tradition, the South shall rise again.

Comment Re:Let's start by repealing the 17th Amendment... (Score 1) 233

If we put Senators back under the control of state legislatures, they'll be less influenced by outside money because the state legislatures can yank the leash when these "law makers" stop representing their constituents appropriately. This would make the Citizens United decision less relevant, at least on the Senate side.

Agreed. The Senate was assembled to be the voice of the States, the House to be the voice of the people, repeal the 17th Amendment.

The House reps are another story, (etc.)

Term limits.

Comment Complexity Begets Abuse (Score 1) 233

Schemes like those proposed by the author may have great intentions but ultimately fail because they are silly and contrived means to solve a simple problem. The problem isn't money, its how the money is raised and funneled to this group or that candidate with no accountability.

The start of the solution in the US is 3 parts;

1. Term limits for Congress, judges and the top two tiers of the bureaucracy.

2. In races for political office; full disclosure of all personal, professional, business, charity, fellowship, board membership etc. financial affairs. Donations/contributions to campaigns, individual, business and/or bundled, or affiliated charities/organizations must have full granular disclosure within 48 hours of receipt all the way down to a living person.

3. Remove the limits on personal donations/contributions to campaigns, eliminate campaign donations from corporations, businesses, PACs, charities or any other organization, eliminate foreign contributions regardless of how far removed they are.

4. Organizations may be formed to collect and spend money promoting or defeating a particular issue. The org is tied to that issue, may only produce material about that issue, may not mention other groups, people or issues and have a 1 year life span after which they are disbanded and all unused funds are forfeited to the state in which the PAC was formed and all members/founders/managers/workers of the org may not participate in another org, including political campaigns for a candidate, for 5 years.

My two cents.

Comment Re:why? (Score 1) 196

And yeah... he could have stayed anonymous if he'd wanted to be kidnapped and hauled off to a black site. Putting his name and face to the news gave the story credibility and staying power. Snowden is the man to thank for the 82% concern about NSA surveillance and the ~60% support for weakening the Patriot Act. True, it's not enough to put an end to their shenanigans and restore reverence for human rights and due process, but it's definitely a setback for the NSA.

^^ This

Comment Re:There appears to have been a sea change (Score 1) 196

Snowden's revelations have either hurt or in some cases come close to ruining the business of many US companies. While it is the norm on this forum to assume the worst about large corporations in particular, In many cases companies have suffered damage without collaborating in any way with the NSA that has yet been proven. Cisco for example has been losing sales not because they allowed the NSA to screw around with their equipment but rather because the NSA intercepted their shipments. I don't expect corporations to be reluctant to cooperate with the NSA in future out of some moral idealism, companies will be reluctant to cooperate with the NSA simply because this affair has taught them that cooperating can result in a serious impact on their bottom line and if there is another Snowden that impact might be even worse.

This cannot be disputed. The appearance of collaboration will indeed hurt the bottom line of many private enterprises that have not made it a priority to ensure whatever data they collect is not somehow safeguarded. To me, as a consumer, safeguarded looks like how, for example, StartPage.com communicates how it handles what data they are able to discover for you using their services.

StartPage, and its sister search engine Ixquick, are the only third-party certified search engines in the world that do not record your IP address or track your searches.

There is this sense of resignation among those in my circle, a shrug of "What can I do about it? I need to use my ..!" and for those that are not tech savvy, this is a real complaint. Borne of ignorance and probably laziness, but real nonetheless. Refuse. Resist. Encrypt. Choose to remove yourself from that ecosystem inasmuch as possible. Where it is not possible, obfuscate and use cash where able.

Comment Re:I can see this running afoul of.... (Score 1) 545

The exceptions do not invalidate the rule, they test it. Just because because someone smears themselves in shit and eats the face off of a vagrant doesn't mean that laws banning bath salts are wrong. Just because someone wishes to have a say in what goes into their body especially when it comes to infectious diseases doesn't mean religion is an invalid motivator.

Slashdot Top Deals

Parallel lines never meet, unless you bend one or both of them.

Working...