Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Internet

Online Bot Traffic Will Exceed Human Traffic By 2027, Cloudflare CEO Says 51

Cloudflare's CEO predicts AI-driven bot traffic will surpass human internet traffic by 2027, as AI agents generate vastly more web requests than people. "If a human were doing a task -- let's say you were shopping for a digital camera -- and you might go to five websites. Your agent or the bot that's doing that will often go to 1,000 times the number of sites that an actual human would visit," Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said in an interview at SXSW this week. "So it might go to 5,000 sites. And that's real traffic, and that's real load, which everyone is having to deal with and take into account." TechCrunch reports: Before the generative AI era, the internet was only about 20% bot traffic, with Google's web crawler being the largest, according to Prince, whose infrastructure and security company is used by one-fifth of all websites. But beyond some other reputable crawlers, the only other bots were those used by scammers and bad actors. "With the rise of generative AI, and its just insatiable need for data, we're seeing a rise where we suspect that, in 2027, the amount of bot traffic online will exceed the amount of human traffic that's online," Prince said.

The executive also noted that this change to the web would require the development of new technologies, like sandboxes for AI agents that can be spun up on the fly and then torn down when their task has finished. These could come into play when consumers ask AI agents to perform certain tasks on their behalf, like planning a vacation. "What we're trying to think about is, how do we actually build that underlying infrastructure where you can -- as easily as you open a new tab in your browser -- you can actually spin up new code, which can then run and service the agents that are out there," Prince said. He imagines there will soon be a time when millions of these "sandboxes" for agents would be created every second.
"I think the thing that people don't appreciate about AI is it's a platform shift," Prince said. "AI is another platform shift ... the way that you're going to consume information is completely different."

Submission + - r/linux poster unearths Meta's lobbying net behind OS Age Verfication blitz (archive.org)

He Who Has No Name writes: In an incredibly in-depth researched post that was removed by Reddit mods almost as soon as it went up but is preserved at Archive.org, Reddit user Ok_Lingonberry3296 has dug deep into lobbying activity and records across multiple states and at the federal level to unearth what — or who — is behind the nationwide state-level and federal legislation blitz of nearly identical age verification laws targeting operating systems instead of companies — with no carveout for open source, no awareness of how these centralized control models break when applied to a FOSS operating system like Linux, and no apparent regard for the avalanche of second order effects the legislation could cause in contexts like embedded devices, VMs, and data centers.

The culprit that emerges isn't a huge surprise: a recently created lobbying org called the Digital Childhood Alliance, which appears to be functionally a front group for the lobbying efforts of... (drumroll) ...Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, formerly Facebook.

Ok_Lingonberry3296 writes: "...Rep. Kim Carver (R-Bossier City), the sponsor of Louisiana's HB-570, publicly confirmed that a Meta lobbyist brought the legislative language directly to her. The bill as drafted required only app stores (Apple, Google) to verify user ages. It did not require social media platforms to do anything.

...Senator Jay Morris, who expanded the bill to include app developers alongside app stores after Google's senior director of government affairs publicly questioned why "Mark Zuckerberg is so keen on passing these bills." When Morris introduced his amendment, Meta went silent. The conference committee compromise maintained dual responsibility but kept the primary burden on app stores, which is what Meta wanted from the start.

At that same Senate hearing, Morris directly questioned DCA Executive Director Casey Stefanski about who funds her organization. She reportedly deflected, said she "wasn't comfortable answering," then under continued pressure admitted tech companies provide funding but refused to name them."

The research gets into funding, connected groups (on both sides of the political aisle) involved with lobbying, messaging, funding, and other parts of the legislative push, and most of all, tracks the money.

For those that want to dig into the research itself, OK_Lingonberry3296 posted their entire folder of research and sources on github, here: github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings

A quick synopsis of where the US laws currently stand:

CA | AB-1043 | Enacted, effective Jan 1, 2027
CO | SB26-051 | Passed Senate, in House committee
LA | HB-570 | Enacted, effective July 1, 2026
UT | SB-142 | Enacted, first in nation
TX | SB-2420 | Enjoined by federal judge
NY | S8102A | Pending
IL | HB-3304, HB-4140, SB-2037 | Pending
Federal | KOSA, ASAA | Pending

Comment Re: renewables (Score 1) 184

"We're going to make ourselves absolutely dependent on a rabid dog for a thing we have to have and can never actually turn off so that if the rabid dog attacks our neighbor, the rabid dog might be slowed down by us turning off the thing we can't ever actually turn off" is logic that could only ever exist in European parliaments.

Idiots. Arrogant, cowardly idiots with the blood of millions on their hands, now.

Comment Re: renewables (Score 3, Insightful) 184

It wasn't a momentary, passing thing. Activism in the west against civil nuclear power, especially in Europe, has been heavily driven by Russian intelligence for decades precisely because - surprise! - kneecapping European energy independence serves Russian goals and makes the Russian petrol empire more money. European energy policy was under sustained attack, and once bad actors got into various drivers seats, the Euros were too proud and arrogant to listen to anybody trying to send up warnings. Now they're paying the price.

Oh, and the previous German prime minister who oversaw most of the major German nuclear energy drawfown (Schroeder) was probably either compromised by Russia or a full blown Russian asset; he went from the PM office to a board seat at Gazaprom. Merkel is heavily suspect as well at this point just based on the blatantly obvious results of her policies, including the ones she continued from Schroeder.

Whatever. They can eat the consequences of their own arrogance.

Comment Re: The Chinese Way (Score 1) 62

I don't care if somebody is an immigrant or not. Their actions are what I care about. Either they hold to and live by values I respect and am compatible with, or they don't. That's not immutable characteristics, that's choices. If they hold to the values I this country hold, they're my brother, full stop. If they don't, they need to go somewhere else that works for them, because that place isn't here and I'm not okay with terraforming it to fit them instead of us.

Comment Re:The Chinese Way (Score 2, Insightful) 62

That makes exactly zero sense.

We handle criminal citizens internally because they are family, not guests.

We deport criminal guests precisely because they are guests, not family.

It's so painfully self-evident that anybody arguing otherwise is probably being deliberately obtuse, and that's being generous.

Comment Re:The more competition the better (Score 1) 18

I mean, you're right, but stop and look at it from Microsoft's perspective. They don't really care. They're pushing Windows with every release to be more like a mobile OS because that's what the average casual tech user knows and uses daily. They've moved productivity software from local machines to the cloud as subscription software, which is basically OS-agnostic. It doesn't care if you log in from an iOS tablet or somebody running Haiku or FreeBSD.

They're actively trying to replace most of their actual, human developers with AI, so losing their larger developer ecosystem is clearly something they no longer consider a major risk.

They have major vendor lock-in in the large corporate spaces because of regulatory and compliance lock-in, plus inertia. PwC, Goldman Sachs, and Lockheed Martin aren't moving their office drones to Linux Mint any time soon. Some of them can't even if they wanted to because Windows + certain security solutions are required as part of various regulatory compliance modes for their field.

Basically... Microsoft is only doing Windows anymore because it sort of gets them other things they actually want, and the days of it still being the key to those things are very much on the downswing.

Comment Re:The more competition the better (Score 4, Interesting) 18

I think part of the problem is that even Microsoft doesn't really care about Windows anymore. It's an obligatory means to their actual goal. The key computing markets are corporate customers and gaming; mundane everyday users have shifted mostly to mobile or web stuff (like Office 365), and corporate customers are the 900 lb gorilla because gamers are vocal but small as a group in comparison. Big data centers are mostly running some flavor of *nix (even MS or Amazon ones), and let's just skip the MacOS folks. Don't get involved with cults.

So for MS, Windows is a thing they have to do to keep large corporate customers who buy tens of thousands of licenses and service contracts every year for hundreds of millions of dollars. They don't even really care about Bob Smith, basic PC Owner. There's no money for them there and it's a shrinking market anyway.

You can either use the flexibility of a free project - not driven by profit motive - to displace an uninterested party with motivations elsewhere, or you can threaten their piggy bank by displacing their larger cash cow (corporate level bulk use). But gamers as an OS market will not swing Microsoft. Microsoft will just keep doing Xbox stuff (possibly even on Playstation). They're too sclerotic to meaningfully tackle a smaller market like PC gaming. Maybe 20-25 years ago, but not these days.

Comment Steve Jobs' legacy will be the impact of smartphon (Score 5, Funny) 120

I have a strong suspicion that historians 100, 200, maybe 500 years from now won't look at Apple as a technology company and Jobs as a leader and inventor, they will look at them as harbingers of disastrous unforseen consequences, like Whitney and the cotton gin or Nobel and nitro.
Jobs created a device that has directly and indirectly unraveled centuries, and in some cases millenium, of painstaking civilizational growth and development... and he will be remembered for that, not one company or a UI innovation on desktops.

Also he was an asshole.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Virtual" means never knowing where your next byte is coming from.

Working...