Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Can someone explain (Score 1) 89

I've been recommending MSE for ages now as it seems to work fine for me. In a corporate environment, I have also long recommended the equivalent System Center Endpoint Protection (SCEP formerly Forefront Endpoint Protection). However, recent AV tests show that SCEP/FEP (and MSE which uses the same AV engine) are significantly worse than any of the competition.

Take a look at http://dennistechnologylabs.com/reports/s/a-m/2012/ which puts SCEP at the bottom of the heap (although Trend doesn't fare much better to be honest)

Then look at the slightly older comparison at http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/corporate-user/julaug-2012/ (FEP gets 2/6 for protection - lower than the next nearest - McAfee and Trend - both of which get 3.5/6

Comment Re:Encapsulating IE6 (Score 2, Interesting) 470

All very well when you're sitting at home but have you ever worked in a large corporation? Most PCs aren't powerful enough to run a second virtual OS instance and, even if they could, maintaining, patching and securing a second OS on every PC effectively doubles the admin overhead of the network - not to mention the licensing cost of doubling the number of antivirus seats you have etc. Virtual XP mode is only suitable for home users and for very specific cases in larger organisations. For large-scale rollout another solution is needed. If you want to stick with the virtual XP based solution but have it manageable, Microsoft have MED-V which will happily run an seamlessly instanced IE6 (as virtual XP mode does) but is clever enough to automatically switch between the native IE8 browser and the virtual IE6 browser based on which URLs you are visiting. MED-V still suffers from the increased hardware requirements of running a second virtualized OS on a client PC. Other alternatives are to deploy IE6 using Citrix XenApp running on a Windows 2003-based server but this also suffers from the same issues or VMware have just announced full support for IE6 running under ThinApp which is probably the least-worst option for most organisations if it weren't for the licensing angle.

Microsoft have a huge number of tools and information on performing compatibility testing prior to a Win7 rollout and anyone considering it I would highly recommend looking into the (free) Application Compatibility Toolkit (ACT). For more thorough appcompat testing, look at the toolset provided by App-DNA which is fantastic.

Comment Re:The ONLY Correct Answer (Score 2, Informative) 215

As someone who works for a Microsoft Gold Partner I suppose I ought to defend Windows Server 2008 but the Core version *DOES* have half a GUI (the command line is in a window and it uses notepad for text editing for instance). What it does lack is .NET Framework support - apparently that needs a full GUI to even install and therefore PowerShell is NOT currently available on Server Core!

Slashdot Top Deals

Nature always sides with the hidden flaw.

Working...