Comment Other systems still needed (Score -1) 107
Running entirely on chemical based systems best thing. The primary drawback is the response time of the system. Chemical battery discharge alone has a seconds-to-minutes response time. This is not adequate to support commercial applications like hospitals/data centres/work offices, etc. It also does not allow reactions to spikes in the grid, which can save thousands of dollars a month. Hybrid systems using flywheels have low fire risk and have 250ms response times. I can see that this technology, combined with systems like TORUS, provides a better long-term setup for many applications. Peak Energy's solution would definitely have other applications that it would be a good fit for, like long term storage for solar grids or replacing systems that do have fire prone risks.