I think a basic income is more ideal than a guaranteed job.

Here's why:
If I'm guaranteed to have at least *some* income, I will be more inclined to take risks. That could be starting my own business (without fear of failing) or going back to school for another degree.

If I'm guaranteed a job, I feel as though I owe something more to someone else -- whomever I'm guaranteed the job to. I would be less inclined to improve my own situation if I'm unhappy there, because it's easier to just stay put since I know my job is guaranteed. This would lead to a quality of life decline, as I become evermore frustrated with a position I may not be fully happy with.

Mailbird on Windows.
Sparrow on Mac. (You can pry it from my cold, dead hands.)
Gmail on Android.

I do, actually. And yes, it's a good way to get the news. It's so much faster to flip through articles than loading a page with blocking javascript and images...

I've been advocating for this for years. It's just a difficult concept for some people to understand. "What do you mean I won't wake up until 3am? That seems really early!" *facepalm*

Having some insight into the actual products and mechanisms by which spam filtering is done, I can say fairly conclusively that the biggest issue at hand is that consumers cannot and will not pay for the hardware necessary to do spam filtering anymore. Let me explain:

In days of yore, spam filtering was done with an appliance (or server/service) that did heuristics scanning. This mechanism worked well, but people found that there were a lot of repeat offenders -- so let's just block them entirely with an RBL (realtime block list). This is easy to do with IPv4, as we have a relatively small amount of offending addresses. The amount of resources to load this RBL into memory and process emails in real-time was reasonable.

Enter the modern age:

Spam emails have gotten incredibly sophisticated. I've noticed that some blatant spam has even gotten through gmail's filters to my inbox lately. Heuristics are a large part of it, but when they're so complex, we really need to lean even more heavily on RBLs. Unfortunately, that's no longer feasible. Now that IPv6 has taken off, if you end up on the block list, you simply change your IPv6 address, and you're back in business. Since we have (for all intents and purposes) a limitless supply of IPv6 addresses, it's unreasonable to have an IPv6 RBL -- especially one that *any* appliance can load into memory and process in real-time -- for the same cost as an appliance that would previously handle an IPv4 RBL.

Here, we find our conundrum: spam has gotten to the point of bypassing all but the most brilliant of heuristics scanning mechanisms, and RBLs are no longer an option. In order to have an appliance capable of handling *everything* that a modern spammer can throw at you, you'd be looking at spending tens of thousands of dollars of raw material cost on a server -- plus the software and overhead to develop the solution into a consumer-facing product. That is in contrast to the relatively inexpensive solutions that were so prolific only a few years ago.

tl;dr: IPv6 killed the spam filter.

Dammit...ignore me. I didn't read everything first.

Spamhaus' RBL has a permanent block on Comcast's residential prefixes. You can't petition them to change it, so you're always going to be blocked. Sorry. Aside from that, Comcast blocks outbound SMTP, for spam reasons. It is absolutely possible to get Comcast to unblock your traffic -- I know, because I've done it. (I have the phone number and name of the guy I talked to taped to my modem... but that's not with me, at the moment. Sorry.) If you do get them to unblock the traffic (they'll ask you why you need to, etc. It's a very personal process.), it'll be good until you reboot your modem. If that happens (let's hope the power never goes out), you'll have to call back and have them unblock it. So, yeah: you can absolutely get Comcast to unblock it. The problem comes down to getting other mail servers to accept the email as NOT spam (thanks Spamhaus!).

There appears to be some validity to this; http://cl.ly/image/3N1l1t3H0V1...

I find the new page to be too narrow, otherwise it's a decent evolution of the current design.

Nice. You can see me shooting photos at the top left, near the end. That's pretty awesome.

I have 3 monitors. Who needs virtual desktops?

A relatively simple project that I did in highschool was turn my dish into an 802.11 unidirectional antenna. I could pick up wifi for miles. On the down side, I walked in front of it, so now I'm sterile and permanantly tanned... Your mileage may vary though.