Enough evidence to support a full refund? (Score 1)

Is it not bad enough that someone first broke in... proving the lack of security. Looking back at the whole reason is was kept closed source.... and i paraphrase "not seeing the source keeps (haha) from seeing holes which could otherwise be seen in open source". The company i work for has spent near 1/4 million dollars on M$ products, liscensing, and support. The fact that my boss relies on the fact that the source is closed (in his mind)... this seems to be a very big implication and would be reason enough to save our money from now on, and use a solution that isnt so damn backwards. I can only imagine how much money we are continually losing even using the "Great Plains" accounting system. If this leak is indeed legit, M$ isnt doing its job and os letting down its customers. Furthermore when my business completely relies on a company that cant even protect itself...

I have enough to worry about, this should be the last thing that should happen. Let this be a clear message that easy isnt always better... any forest gump can run a M$ product...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/993933.stm

I SAY NO MORE!!!!!

No more promises..... you let me down M$