Google has been carbon-neutral since 2007, and that specifically includes co2 generated by business travel and commuting.

https://www.greenbiz.com/artic...

Here's the change log[1] for the 90.0.4430.11 stable release. It covers changes for about one week.

[1] https://chromium.googlesource....

I guess I missed that in the article. The summary says that they were asked to pick between "ad-supported" and "paid".

Were the respondents asked about "free" vs other options?

[For the record, I'm sure that everyone would love free stuff. That's hardly worth running a survey on. But in this case, the survey in question wasn't asking that.]

You might want to review what happened in France[1] and Spain[2]. If the rule is "thou shalt not use this content without paying $other-party$", then removing that content seems like a reasonable solution.

[1] https://www.engadget.com/2019-...
[2] https://www.engadget.com/2014-...

Also note that Google/Alphabet paid 5.3B in 2019 and FACE paid 6.3B

Apparently, "pays no taxes" equals about $20B

Ummmm.... I'd like to install a non-webkit browser then.

That looks cool - thanks for posting it - hadn't seen it yet.

There's not much to it, in terms of mechanical (high precision+reliable motor) or electronics (replaceable battery + four buttons + microchip). I think the biggest thing is testing and approval process.

They charge a lot for the devices, but a lot of that cost goes into patient training before they hand over a high-risk medical device.

I really wish that Jay Radcliffe hadn't publicized the well-known security issues with my pump. I'm fairly convinced that that led to the lock-down on insulin pumps.

I've been looping for several years now, and the results are amazing. It's way more effective than any other therapy I've used (way better control, better A1C), but more importantly I now have a hardware solution that offloads about 100 decisions per day from my life. That part is truly life changing.

Unfortunately, my current device is held together with duct tape, and it's unlikely that any new hackable devices will be brought to market. I expect it will be 10+ years before the commercially supported devices provide the same control I've enjoyed from a home-built solution, since the manufacturers are understandably conservative/risk-averse.

So I'm confused... the study is about "search quality", but I don't understand how they define that term. They were looking at search engines that changed their retention policy. They evaluated search quality before and after. That part sounds good.

It seems that they counted the number of users coming from search engine A and landing at site B before and after. Can anyone explain how that's an indicator of search quality? Perhaps they want to measure if the search engine lost or gained users?

TL/DR: If you want to close tabs to the right: shift click the rightmost tab, press ctrl-W.

Ctrl-click on a tab to "select" it, without losing your current selection.
Shift-click to select select a group of tabs.
You can drag any set of tabs out of the current browser.

Enjoy!

If you're not in incognito mode, you should be able to press Ctrl-Shift-T to reopen the last closed tab. If you closed a window, all of the tabs come back.

This:

is already true. Bluetooth devices aren't visible to web apps without user permission. Source: https://webbluetoothcg.github....

Apple’s App Store policies state: “Apps that browse the web must use the iOS WebKit framework and WebKit Javascript.” Source: http://www.howtogeek.com/18428...

Note to author: Your link in step 2 requires an AppleID, which you said you didn't need in step 1.