The problem is not getting over the 2000 election. It is in overcoming the results of it.

Alright Sir, Please. Step away from your confirmation bias.

Do you have actual evidence for this claim (other than your vivid imagination)?

This quote sums up the reason science will always conflict with religion. "Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned." -Author unknown

Looks like a black or white statement you've made there. Too bad its just plain wrong.

Cutting taxes on the rich while financing two wars off the books means that award goes to his predecessor. The current president is just trying to clean up the mess.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_deficit#Recent_additions_to_the_public_debt_of_the_United_States

FY2009 $1785.6 billion 12.5% GDP
FY2010 $1471.0 billion (est.)10.0% GDP

We are now in FY2011, FY2009 budget began Oct 1 2008, A few weeks before the "most mindblowingly fiscally irresponsible President this country has ever seen" was elected.

You can read a good summary of that scandal here.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29/news-views-gossip/ub-scandal-sticky-251207/

when it is "written in a scientific journal" it is taken to be true.

Actually, "when it is written in a scientific journal", makes it publicly available to anyone interested in either verifying or refuting "what is written".