Movie length has gotten so long that they need to bring back the intermission. I miss the intermission. Who wants to buy a big drink to enjoy with popcorn and then be uncomfortable for the last hour of the movie. If I wait until it comes out on line I can stop the show and take a break get a snack. Why go to a theater where you have to get up and miss part of the show to relieve yourself? Theaters screwed themselves when they eliminated the intermission. It cut the profits of extra concession sales and drove most viewers home for comfort.
That and annoying people is why I stopped going. Seeing/hearing people's phones is during the movie is annoying. I have a nice home theater setup at home, my recliner is way more comfortable, and I can pause the movie anytime I want to if I need to use the bathroom, grab a snack, dinner, or a beer, that I don't have pay 10 times more than it's worth.
I think this suggestion would be in the spirit of 'in addition to' rather than 'instead of'.
All the hard measures listed are about government controlled offices and institutions, with a less compelling "please do work from home" call to businesses. Businesses that externalize the commute cost so they don't have a particularly strong motivation to be accommodating.
If you made the businesses bear the commute costs, then they at least would have real skin in the game. Not just for the current situation, but ongoing motivation to consider whether the personnel *really* have value to be directly there in general.
And if they go that route add surge pricing if they want to start their day at 0800 and end it at 1700, with incentives or discounts if they stagger the opening and closing times as that would do wonders for scalling back rush hour. They have known for decades you just can't afford to build enough roads to handle every single person having to be to work at exactly the same time.
Is the internet still a series of tubes? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"The optical fiber elements are typically individually coated with plastic layers and contained in a protective tube suitable for the environment where the cable is used" So considering most of the Internet is optical fiber in a protective tube, that would be yes. Even the copper parts of copper wires are contained in a protective plastic tube. Is that the best way to put it, not really most of us would probably call it a sleeve or casing, but it is a hollow cylinder, in which wires or fibers carrying data are placed, which makes it a type of tube. And before say they have to carry a liquid, think vaccum tubes or cathode ray tubes, all electonics (from when he was growing up) ran on tubes, so not too surprising he stil thinks that way.
Often, yes. The largest outbreaks of nonendemic disease in the US are commonly linked to insular Christian groups that spurn vaccination, but go on missions to countries where these diseases have not been eradicated. There, they contract the illness and bring it back to spread amongst their antivaxxer congregations until there's sufficient load to spread to their greater communities. A handful of migrants interacting with a population with herd immunity aren't going to cause these large outbreaks.
Is a number equal to 4% of the US population just a 'handful', because that's roughly the number in the US that were not screened through a port of entry? That's a pretty significant amount that came in with zero screening to make sure their immunizations were up to date and they didn't actively have a 'nonendemic disease' when they entered the country. 2 doses of MMR is 97% effective, meaning 3% of the people that were vaccinated are not immune and can get measles if exposed. That 'insular Christian community' is a fraction of of a percent of the population (around 400K), which is a lot less than the 3% of immunized folks (10+ million) that think they are immune but actually are not. Which illustrates why we want herd immunity to protect that 3%.
I've got a bad feeling about this.