Comment Re:Matter/antimatter annihilation (Score 1) 133
No, it's the "NEARLY" equal amounts that's the key here. There was a slight surplus of "regular" matter vs. antimatter, & this minuscule surplus is what we have today. Matter & antimatter annihilate each other on contact (or, rather, just turn into so many high-energy photons), so the antimatter presumably went rather quickly, almost immediately after it was formed. There might still be some antimatter floating around, but only in infinitesimal amounts & produced very recently.
Scientifically, this slight surplus of matter vs. antimatter is quite interesting. Why should there be? And if there is an inequality, why should it be such a small proportion, rather than, say, twice as much (or 10^9 as much) matter vs. antimatter? There might be some notions on this, but I don't keep up on this stuff.