Re:Peer review? (Score 1)

I wrote to the creator(s) of this site and expressed similar concern, telling them that without identifying the reviewers, there is no way to tell if it's a second year undergraduate or a fellow of the Royal Society and thus no way to determine the validity of their scientific review. Lo and behold, it turns out that they are using undergraduate and graduate students as their "scientist" reviewers. I'm willing to call it a draw with the grad students as they have at least demonstrated sufficient competency in their field to be admitted to their various programs. The use of undergraduates raises serious concerns about the truthiness of their claim that "every science video on ScienceHack is screened by a scientist to verify its accuracy and quality".