Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I don't normally say this, but... (Score 1) 255

Ok, it is now clear what you mean. If google stops sending money under no conditions after some time, you can always use method X to get money instead. My point was not that google has power, but that google _will_ stop sending money under no conditions. Energy is therefore better invested in developing method X instead of drafting contracts with google.
Crime

Three Indicted In Scareware Scam That Netted $100M 120

alphadogg writes "Three men are facing federal fraud charges for allegedly raking in more than $100 million while running an illegal 'scareware' business called Innovative Marketing that tricked victims into installing bogus software. The company's products generated so many consumer complaints that in 2008 the FTC brought a civil action against Innovative Marketing and call center partner Byte Hosting, effectively putting them out of business. On Wednesday, a grand jury in Chicago handed down criminal charges, meaning the three men now face jail time if convicted." One of the men indicted is in Ohio and the others are believed to be in Ukraine and Sweden. Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit helped out with the case.
Hardware Hacking

Controlling Games and Apps Through Muscle Sensors 47

A team with members from Microsoft, the University of Toronto, and the University of Washington have developed an interface that uses electrodes to monitor muscle signals and translate those into commands or button presses, allowing a user to bypass a physical input device and even control a game or application while their hands are full. The video demonstration shows somebody playing Guitar Hero by making strumming motions and tapping his fingers together, a jogger changing his music without having to touch the device, and a man flexing a muscle to open the trunk of his car while he carries objects in both hands. The academic paper (PDF) is available online.
Robotics

Moon-Excavation Robots Face Off 61

avishere writes "Student teams designed and built robotic power-lifters to excavate simulated lunar soil (a.k.a. 'regolith') earlier this month, with $750,000 in prizes up for grabs. Excavating regolith, according to NASA, will be an important part of any construction projects or processing of natural resources on the Moon. Interestingly, regolith is especially difficult to dig because its dust particles want to stick together. The whole robotic system has to be sturdy enough to scoop moon dirt and powerful enough to move through the dust while still meeting the weight requirements. The winning excavator, from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts, lifted 1,103 pounds within the allotted time, and got its creators a sweet $500,000 for their troubles."
The Media

Journalists Looking For Government Money 323

We've been following the ongoing struggles of the print media, watching as some publications have died off and others have held to outdated principles and decried the influence of the internet. A side effect of this has been many journalists put out of work and many others fearful that informed reporting is on its way out as well. Now, an editorial in the Washington Post calls for a solution journalists would likely have scoffed at only a few years ago: federal subsidies. Robert W. McChesney and John Nichols write, "What to do? Bailing out media conglomerates would be morally and politically absurd. These firms have run journalism into the ground. If they cannot make it, let them go. Wait for 'pay-wall' technologies, billionaire philanthropists or unimagined business models to generate enough news to meet the immense demands of a self-governing society? There is no evidence that such a panacea is on the horizon. This leaves one place to look for a solution: the government." They hasten to add, "Did we just call for state-run media? Quite the opposite."

Comment Re:Where Have I Heard This Before? (Score 1) 367

The following example might make my point clearer: If anyone tells you that he things randomly killing people is morally acceptable, you would disagree and accuse him of being evil. Most people would do that. Now for stallman distributing non-free software might be as evil as killing someone, I do not know. But stallman delivering speeches saying "You shall not distribute or use free software" is not qualitatively different from a speech saying "You shall not kill". The only difference is that most people agree on the second one, but not the first.

You do not have to agree with Stallman on anything. But criticising him for actually having and expressing his opinions does not make any sense. I sometimes do criticise people for not having an opinion or not expressing it, never the other way around.

Comment Re:Where Have I Heard This Before? (Score 1) 367

If you disagree with me on X, it is obivious that I will tell everyone that you are wrong on X. If I did not do so, what would be the point of even having an opinion on X? You are confusing things. Bush uses his power to force his will on other people (or destroy them should they not comply). Does Stallman do this? (Does he actually have any power?) I do not think so, but actually I do not know. But accusing someone of having an immoral opinion on anything is a totally harmless (and in my opinion perfectly unquestionable) thing.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you sell diamonds, you cannot expect to have many customers. But a diamond is a diamond even if there are no customers. -- Swami Prabhupada

Working...