Comment Re:Global Warming Fanatics Do the Same (Score 2, Interesting) 623
Example: They'll only refer to the cities / countries showing warming trends, and ignore those that are actually showing cooling trends. Both sides do it.
If big tobacco was smart (and I'm sure they are), they would play both sides of the game. Like for instance, big tobacco would do studies to support the claim the global warming exists, screw up the study, and get this to be one of the top studies that people use when trying to prove that global warming exists. They aren't going to do any damage to their cause because there would already be valid scientific studies out there. They are just replacing the valid scientific studies with crappy studies. If you can't beat your enemy, replace them with something you can beat.
If big tobacco was smart (and I'm sure they are), they would play both sides of the game. Like for instance, big tobacco would do studies to support the claim the global warming exists, screw up the study, and get this to be one of the top studies that people use when trying to prove that global warming exists. They aren't going to do any damage to their cause because there would already be valid scientific studies out there. They are just replacing the valid scientific studies with crappy studies. If you can't beat your enemy, replace them with something you can beat.
