Comment Re:"Can't have it both ways" is the core argument (Score 1) 282
Section 230 doesn't require them to "treat everyone fairly". That's a made-up requirement.
Section 230 doesn't require them to "treat everyone fairly". That's a made-up requirement.
Yes, but being able to sue the auditors and hold them accountable would resolve that conflict. They'd have CYA motivation.
and we'll never know it's happening. They're already seeing through our clothes...seeing a number on a scale is the least of our privacy worries.
What's the Republican solutions to those things?
Considering all were outside of government control, there's nothing that they can do. Their goal of taking control of Congress isn't to provide solutions, but to say "no" to any attempts to fix anything. Then point and say "see, government is a failure", while insuring it's so.
The last thing we need are courts deciding science, instead of scientists. That's a dangerous road to go down, where facts don't matter, but emotion deciding what's "true".
Before they can force social media platforms to do this, they'll need to take some steps first.
1. Throw out Citizens United that stated corporations are "people" with the same rights as citizens.
2. Make ISPs common carriers that must follow Net Neutrality, you can't expect platforms to be neutral if our access isn't.
3. Force judges, Congress, and anyone else making decisions about technology, to pass a basic course in understanding it.
Or, you'd still work 40hr weeks. 32hr at $17/hr, and 8hr at $25.50 (overtime at 1.5x).
So from $680/week, to $748/week.
I see everyone commenting about reduced pay and hours. But, they wouldn't prevent people from working more than 32hrs. It would just be overtime after 32hrs, which is 1.5x hourly pay.
So, if you're at $15/hr, your weekly pay goes from $600/week, to $660. This is the more likely scenario. Places aren't just going to stop production after 32hrs, nor are they going to hire people to fill in that time.
I'm leaning towards the personal Family plan, 6 users, $100/year. My Google Apps is just family members anyways.
It is when you allow travel for people who weren't Chinese, and didn't even bother to test or quarantine the Americans returning from those supposed banned countries.
Everything you just described would not be affected by spinning off Instagram and Whatsapp. "Breaking" Facebook up in any meaningful way would mean all those things no longer work as expected now.
If it's connected to the car, then you don't have to touch it...
Unless your evidence is the contract stating you were owed an exclusive theatrical release, then you have nothing. The fact the lawyer used the word "promises" likely means it wasn't in there.
LOL, if you don't die, or maybe end up with permanent damage to your body. Vaccines were developed for a reason.
...they'll also remove apps. How is it news that a company must comply with laws and regulations in the countries they do business in?
Ma Bell is a mean mother!