Fucking brilliant. That's exactly what it is. People forget that we're not talking about serious debate in the scientific community. We're talking about vested moneyed interest in the billions of dollars fighting against any evidence to protect profit against reasoned scientific debate. If you believe that cigarettes cure cancer, you are not just scientifically radical or exploring a different theory. You are directly supporting a view that protects the interests of profit over the interests of truth and the public good. That's not science, that's hucksterism. It isn't wrong to deny people certification when they are deliberately endangering people. That's why certification was invented. Before the AMA, anyone could make "medicine" and sell it on the street. Plus, what's the harm in changing our habits to embrace technologies and innovations which do not support Global Warming? What would it hurt? So, we find out later that the billion-to-one chance that Global Warming was not human caused, so what. Then we can go back to burning coal if people want, and there will still be some.