Re:others (Score 1)

Speaking as an experienced mapper who has used GtkRadiant years, Tread is lacking a great deal. Perhaps it will become better, but it seems like a waste to develop it when Radiant is already much better and open source.

I'm curious as to what is missing from Tread 3.0 *alpha* I've been playing with it off and on for the last week, and while there is a minor Learning curve, from a Q1/Q2 stand point I've found it to be Much faster to work in than gtkRadiant. Please don't get me wrong I'm not saying it's finished, however a blanket statement like "Tread is lacking a great deal." really isn't helpful. while yes Radiant is free and open source, that doesn't all of a sudden close the doors for other editors especially one that has a radically different work flow. I'm truly curious as to what features are lacking, and would love to see a list of said features.