Wind and solar are not cheaper than nuclear in most places, and certainly not by and order of magnitude.
I would like to know where you get your facts from?

Because then it would be classified as radioactive waste, and a whole lot or handling requirements and costs would be needed, and the coal industry don't want that, so they have lobbied that they don't have to classify their flyash as radioactive waste.

That makes no sense. The alcohol evaporates quicker than the water, so the older it is then the less alcohol it has.
Also, water contains no carbon to carbon date.

I find it more likely that they would use new pure ethanol to increase the strength of the cognac, which would incidentally put in a newly created source of carbon.

You are right that U-233 can be used in a nuclear weapon.
However you are wrong that thorium reactors breed pure U-233. It actually breeds U-233 contaminated with U-232, which is almost impossible to separate from U-233 and which further decays to hard gamma emitters, which are both easy to detect, and hard to work with. A fact which they actually saw when they did the test with U-233 bombs you mentioned.
It is much easier, and more efficient, to either enrich uranium ore to get U-235, or breed U-238 into plutonium-239.
From Wikipedia there has been only 3 tests with nuclear bombs which used U-233, of which only 1 was actually a U-233 bomb, the other 2 used a mix of U-233 and U-235 or plutonium.
In fact, to enrich U-235 you don't even need a nuclear reactor, just ore and some centrifuges.

To nitpick a bit, Humphry Davy never isolated it, he tried, but didn't get there.
According to the Wikipedia article the one credited with isolating aluminium was the German scientist Friedrich Wöhler in 1827.

I believe you should look up the definition of the word pervert before you label people.

Actually, the US generated 361,698 GWh (notice the h there) of electricity, which, if you divide it with the number of hours in June, 720, come out to an average generating capacity of 502.36 GW of which 21.5 GW is about 4.3%.

There is quite a difference between GW and GWh.

Just to be a bit pedantic.
While the driver were indeed a Swedish national, the infraction, and the fine, happened in Finland.
Finland recently changed their laws to make their speeding ticket fines (and possible other fines) proportional to the perpetrators wealth.

Then perhaps US males should campaign to get rid of the draft on gender equality grounds?
I don't hear you fighting for males to get less pay for the same work so that we can get gender equality, why would you think that females should do something similar?

I am not sure you have the right chain of events. This TED Talk is an interesting (and scary) explanation of why the bank crash happened, and why it will happen again, unless you get proper regulation.
https://www.ted.com/talks/will...

I don't know exactly what the EU regulation says, but it could be that they allow for different levels for regular food stuff, and food stuff gathered from nature (mushrooms, berries and game). At least that's the divide that the Swedish levels go by. The limts is Sweden for regular food stuff is 300 Bq/kg, and for wild game, mushrooms and berries it is 1500 Bq/kg.

I am afraid to tell you that you are mistaken, Sweden is a member of the EU.
In Norway which is not a member of the EU the levels for Cs 137 in wild game is 3000 Bq/kg.

The levels are not at all the same everywhere else. For example in Sweden the levels of Cs 137 for wild game is 1500 Bq/kg (source in swedish: http://www.faktasamlingcbrn.fo... ).

Note that GP said, less corrupt, not no corruption.
It is quite possible to be less corrupt that the US while still having some considerable corruption left.

No