... Apple retconned it into one because of disappointing sales and tepid interest.
Did they? I know the Apple commentariat did, but has Apple itself made that argument? Apple doesn't have much of a history of saying anything the least bit negative about any of their products.
The article doesn't, but the DOJ court filing does.
In the suit the DOJ makes the interesting argument that Apple is a monopolist because Apple and Samsung combined have a large share of US smartphone revenue. Um, whut? Put me in there too -- combined, the three of us dominate! I'm also a monopolist!
For the record, I think Apple has some anti-competitive policies, but that's just a weird argument.
This means I won't get another Uber Eats gift card.
My own use has dropped dramatically since I stopped programming in Pascal.
... it requires an artificial development schedule to declare a 2026 version and a 2027 version and so on...
Apple already releases operating system versions annually, so renumbering won't change anything. They haven't skipped a year for macOS (variously called Mac OS X or OS X) since 2010, and they've never skipped a year for iOS.
1 decibelgium is approximately equal to 1.06 billion square smoots, which, if you ask me, is plenty of the ocean floor that humans have explored.
My employer had a 4Si that just would not die. We printed a zillion pages on that thing.
We should have wrapped Bill Hewlett and David Packard in magnets and buried them in alternator caskets. By now they're spinning in their graves so fast they could power the world.
I thought it said "Two minutes and 35.41 seconds to mentally multiply two eight-digit numbers times ten" and thought to myself I could probably beat that.
It would shake things up a bit if Apple bought them. They are on a big push to bring chip fabs in-house. But my money is on Dell or Oracle. HP and IBM have the ability, but I don't see them being agile enough to pull it off. Bezos could too, if he wanted to get into tech manufacturing; it just doesn't seem his style.
Apple has done well with its own chips, running as far away from Intel as possible, and they've achieved impressive results. What does Intel have to offer Apple, besides fabrication facilities?
My gut, not my brain says Samsung, and I'm too lazy to research further. Samsung would do very well with Intel. But with Trump coming into office, I'll discount this theory right now.
Not to mention Intel's fabs are years behind TSMC, so making the next A- and M-series SOCs at Intel fabs is a non-starter, unless Apple wants its iPhones and Macs to be fatter, slower, and with worse battery life.
If I've had the shingles vaccine, can I still use the 32TB drive?
You can also watch Apple TV+ in a browser. Soon (maybe already?) it'll be in the Amazon Prime app, which is available almost everywhere.
I'll just buy three Apple Vision Pro instead.
"There was a clown strike, and the clowns threw down their tools."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0zbZDn7juc
The cost of living hasn't affected its popularity.
