Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Weird DOJ argument (Score 1) 61

In the suit the DOJ makes the interesting argument that Apple is a monopolist because Apple and Samsung combined have a large share of US smartphone revenue. Um, whut? Put me in there too -- combined, the three of us dominate! I'm also a monopolist!

For the record, I think Apple has some anti-competitive policies, but that's just a weird argument.

Comment Re:Meh, I'll hold out for iOS Vista (Score 1) 58

... it requires an artificial development schedule to declare a 2026 version and a 2027 version and so on...

Apple already releases operating system versions annually, so renumbering won't change anything. They haven't skipped a year for macOS (variously called Mac OS X or OS X) since 2010, and they've never skipped a year for iOS.

Comment Re:Who else? (Score 1) 105

It would shake things up a bit if Apple bought them. They are on a big push to bring chip fabs in-house. But my money is on Dell or Oracle. HP and IBM have the ability, but I don't see them being agile enough to pull it off. Bezos could too, if he wanted to get into tech manufacturing; it just doesn't seem his style.

Apple has done well with its own chips, running as far away from Intel as possible, and they've achieved impressive results. What does Intel have to offer Apple, besides fabrication facilities?

My gut, not my brain says Samsung, and I'm too lazy to research further. Samsung would do very well with Intel. But with Trump coming into office, I'll discount this theory right now.

Not to mention Intel's fabs are years behind TSMC, so making the next A- and M-series SOCs at Intel fabs is a non-starter, unless Apple wants its iPhones and Macs to be fatter, slower, and with worse battery life.

Slashdot Top Deals

Brain off-line, please wait.

Working...