There are countless examples where more memory saves a lot of computing time. For instance precomputing huge tables of complex functions aided by interpolation allows to spare recomputing these frequently used functions.

Up to now the record of theoretical physics prediction error was ~10^120 for the dark energy (vacuum) density. Great achievement guys!

If we think what we do when "reasoning", it is very similar to applying what we have learned over a very long chain of information gathering and sorting out moments, what is called learning. Learning is nothing else as structuring our neurone network. The whole looks quite similar to what these AI systems do actually.

If I understand correctly in this model all the photons and particles result from the too small black holes which have evaporated into photons and particles, the rest of matter would still be trapped in larger black hole. This is a refreshing perspective of our origins.
Remains just to explain 2/3 of the rest of the universe, dark energy.

Reducing by a factor a few the brightness of satellites is not solvng the astronomer problem. To not spoil the sensitive astronomical observations requires actually a much larger reduction of brightness, which is not possible in practice.
So the solution is actually economical. Starlink is a profit making company that impact third parties. In such cases it is usual to compensate the damages made to astronomical research by financing existing observatories. Each observatory would quantify the time and resource lost caused by the Starlink satellites. I guess the compensation to astronomy would be a negligible amount in regard of the blllions of $ made by Starlink.

Reminder: It is not so hard to hide encrypted information (say images) in the noise bits of legit images.

No, they have clearly no idea how much more meteoritic material is added to the atmosphere, of order of 100 times more what they estimate.

The first point that is not discussed should be to compare the daily mass of satellites burning in the upper atmosphere with the daily 5-300 tons of meteorites and interplanetary dust that do the same.

It could be visible during the April 8th total solar eclipse eclipse in North America, but only in the narrow totality band, a rather unique spectacle.

I don't speak about efficiency, but cost($).

Think Ukraine vs Russia: the advantage of large reactors for your enemy is that they are nice targets for blackmailing.

Solar rooftop often makes sense economically because the energy transport cost may be as large as the energy production cost.

ChatGPT is very weak at calculus (and also arithmetic). I asked to find the maximum of sin(x)/x, which led to verbose calculations filled with logic and math errors. Despite many hints, such as using l'Hospital rule, it would repeat the same mistakes again and again.

The authors still believe Clausius (19th century) stating that âoeThe entropy
of the universe tends to a maximum.â At the time the universe was believed as static and filled with stars, people except Kant didn't even thought about galaxies.
Today we know 2 things that the ignorant authors don't:
1) The universe is expanding since its birth, so there is no mechanical, thus thermal equilibrium, which is obvious when looking at the sky.
2) Gravitating systems, which make the bulk of the universe, have no entropy maximum.

It is not the precedent that China or Russia could argue that is the main problem, it is the hypocrisy of the US, UK, Sweden governments about defending freedom that is obvious to see to all.