I posted this because the original didn't detail the relationship between the 2010 Pixels and the 2015 Pixels.
It may have been brought up in the comments, fair enough, but the comments aren't the story. Not even remotely.
They missed one of the biggest if they left out Issac Newton's calculation error in Principia Mathematica, which was undiscovered until a high-school student spotted it in the 1980s.
I texted the story to a friend of mine before posting it here.... his comment:
"Whoopsie."
I'm still giggling half an hour later.
Actually, it's the exact opposite.
Anti-plagiarism software searches for the same content with completely different styles.
Writer identification involves searching for the same style amongst completely different content.
Most people in my own country of Canada haven't had unlimited data for years and everyone I know still has a NetFlix account.
Not that I LIKE not having unlimited data but it actually has not limited my internet use to any significant extent.
I, for one, am highly impressed that they only managed 78% with a 50 km margin of error.
That must have taken a real effort to be so inaccurate.
Protect us from having to evolve our business!
Links. Links to "all the data". Prove it.
You all speak of the consumer's right to "make an informed choice" but you forget that almost all consumers are uninformed.
My freedom includes the right not to have my right to consume better, genetically-modified food (as backed by actual science) ruined by the paranoia of a propaganda-fueled public.
Please explain to me why I should trust Joe Blow Consumer and his paranoid ability to ruin the market viability of my preferred product, because "his friends say it is bad" over the opinions of actual scientists.
I'm waiting.
Men of lofty genius when they are doing the least work are most active. -- Leonardo da Vinci