You know, it's perfectly possible to stretch an argument so much that it becomes moronic. And you're a top three contender. People are so hell-bent on being outraged and offended that they will prefer it over making rational sense. They guy you responded to didn't "make it about this or that". He simply recognized, as does everyone else, that the bulk of the attention these days is on black people, their history, which involves slavery. He didn't say anything about it being exclusive. Yet you went ahead, sought something that wasn't there, and called someone evil for doing nothing more than expressing the idea that superficial matters won't eradicate racism. He's basically on your side, but don't let that stop you pulling things out of thin air just to be angry.

You know you're in deep shit as a society when the radical left starts repeating George Bush slogans. Your reply is the perfect example of what is wrong with this group of rabid rainbow shitters, they just want things to change, but none of them seem interested in figuring out what it really is they are changing. Let alone whether it's positive or detrimental. Thinking has been replaced by feeling, which is a surefire way to convince yourself you're right. Because who can argue with that?

Have you forgotten about killer bees?

His videos are aimed at convincing laymen by having an air of scientific approach to them. I'm not saying the videos show anything real, but the last one I'd listen to would be West, he's dishonest. I think it would be interesting to sit him around a table with one of the people/witnesses involved, it's easy to spin some yarn when there's nobody to challenge you. God knows he won't allow it on his website.

Mick West is the last person you want to listen to in my opinion. On the topic of 9/11, he's really invested in spewing disinformation, and has been for ages, to the point that I can no longer believe that it's simply out of his personal conviction. This became really apparent when he discussed the matter with Tony Szamboti, an engineer who has done extensive work on the subject, who was also ironically banned on Mick's forum because he sings the wrong tune.

You had about 50 million votes for Trump, and about the same amount for Hillary, as far as I recall. I call that half the country, maybe I should've clarified it was half the voting country, but I thought that'd be obvious. Not sure where the rest of your rant is heading.

You say that as if the alternatives are of better quality. I dislike FOX as much as the next one, but the other half of the country voted for Hillary, that says enough about the state of the media. This polarization is very American, everything is always us vs them, good versus evil, god versus satan, and rather than making sensible or rational choices everything is reduced to blind favouritism. The inability to see fault in the own team is what gave Trump the win, and from the actions of the people in the past 4 years, it doesn't seem like anything has improved, in fact, it probably got a lot worse. And for all the shit you can put on Trump, that's not his doing.

If I were Musk I'd hand out a free ticket to one of the prominent flat earthers so we can end that nonsense. Elon if you read this, do it for science, ffs.

Probably so they can get it when they need it, not just when the pharmacy is open.

Your comparison is meaningless when you want to understand his "state". It could be twice as strong a drug, but the dose could be a tenth of an average shot of heroin. Daily users also develop a tolerance, I don't know how this works for this particular drug, but it's likely that he takes them just be able to operate, and he might appear perfectly fine, not spaced out in some corner.

Right, which is not the Russian people.

That's not an explanation, that's a narrative that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Even the evidence in the official report doesn't support that theory.