Comment In social sciences, nothing is good nor bad. (Score 1) 151
Talked to an old programmer last week. He was complaining. He is extremely qualified, a perfectionist, writes compact and flawless programs, in his own style that he kept tweaking over the decades.
He was complaining. Why? His company forced him to use claude to write code. (Take it or leave it). So he did. Complete new flow. Put in the effort and improved it to the best of his abilities.
His conclusion? The code works, efficiency is not great, but ok. The code often is hard to review because it is very verbose. His job satisfaction dropped below zero as he now is full time checking code from Claude.
The worst part? It costs the company an arm and leg in tokens. The reviews go slow. The code contains way too many subtle bugs. He claimed it would cost less time and money if he did the job himself. He was told to shut up.
Peronally I am very enthousiastic about Claude. But... I just do hobby projects. I never review the code. I am just astonished about what I can do with a few prompts. But yes! I have also stumbled on Claude doing the wrong thing with full confidence. Dragging you in a rats nest with a bad strategy. If the projects are a bit more uncommon, exotic, I noticed that it seems to run around like a headless chicken. I used to do hardware design as a job. No way I would leave the work to an Ai. Way too easy to make things that seem to work at first sight but fail miserably in real life. If you see how bad AI handles simple arithmetic, it clearly is not suited for the job yet.
So... I guess we need a few idio... entrepeneurs who take the jump. Go YOLO and use AI for software design. Make a big profit by selling these products. If they are lucky, it all goes well. If not, they can go bankrupt a few times.
Personally I am not sure what to think of it. It just is too early. I think people that are enthousiastic about Ai are people like me who do not review the code thoroughly. I think the Ai haters have a more realistic view of it. So in summary? It is nor good nor bad. It is not the magic solution, but it is not useless either. It is trouble. But trouble is good. Stick with trouble. That's real life.
He was complaining. Why? His company forced him to use claude to write code. (Take it or leave it). So he did. Complete new flow. Put in the effort and improved it to the best of his abilities.
His conclusion? The code works, efficiency is not great, but ok. The code often is hard to review because it is very verbose. His job satisfaction dropped below zero as he now is full time checking code from Claude.
The worst part? It costs the company an arm and leg in tokens. The reviews go slow. The code contains way too many subtle bugs. He claimed it would cost less time and money if he did the job himself. He was told to shut up.
Peronally I am very enthousiastic about Claude. But... I just do hobby projects. I never review the code. I am just astonished about what I can do with a few prompts. But yes! I have also stumbled on Claude doing the wrong thing with full confidence. Dragging you in a rats nest with a bad strategy. If the projects are a bit more uncommon, exotic, I noticed that it seems to run around like a headless chicken. I used to do hardware design as a job. No way I would leave the work to an Ai. Way too easy to make things that seem to work at first sight but fail miserably in real life. If you see how bad AI handles simple arithmetic, it clearly is not suited for the job yet.
So... I guess we need a few idio... entrepeneurs who take the jump. Go YOLO and use AI for software design. Make a big profit by selling these products. If they are lucky, it all goes well. If not, they can go bankrupt a few times.
Personally I am not sure what to think of it. It just is too early. I think people that are enthousiastic about Ai are people like me who do not review the code thoroughly. I think the Ai haters have a more realistic view of it. So in summary? It is nor good nor bad. It is not the magic solution, but it is not useless either. It is trouble. But trouble is good. Stick with trouble. That's real life.