Comment Re:So? (Score 1) 360
mmmmm, ya, no.
If you were to apply that same reasoning to, oh, say, nicotine, which also causes random DNA breaks and errors in replication, then your argument would say that tobacco isn't in fact linked to lung cancer.
If you were to apply that same reasoning to, oh, say, nicotine, which also causes random DNA breaks and errors in replication, then your argument would say that tobacco isn't in fact linked to lung cancer.
