Comment US healthcare mandates are pushing this (Score 1) 37
Healthcare organizations have HIPAA requirements that are forcing them to look at encrypted processes (either standalone encryption products, or encrypted channels like SSL) to replace FTP for moving personal healthcare information across the internet.
Pretty much across the board, insurers are moving to HTTP based solutions (over SSL obviously). For a few lines of Perl/Java/PHP you can ride on top of existing SSL transport, easily provide redundancy, be universally available to any type of client, etc. Command line tools like cURL (a kick ass utility btw) make it scriptable / automatable.
Features like job control and smart restart aren't inherently included though with HTTP based apps.
FTP over SSL isn't fully standardized from what I can tell. See http://www.ford-hutchinson.com/~fh-1-pfh/ftps-ext. html for a rundown on available clients and servers. IME, there are significant incompatabilities between implementations.
Pretty much across the board, insurers are moving to HTTP based solutions (over SSL obviously). For a few lines of Perl/Java/PHP you can ride on top of existing SSL transport, easily provide redundancy, be universally available to any type of client, etc. Command line tools like cURL (a kick ass utility btw) make it scriptable / automatable.
Features like job control and smart restart aren't inherently included though with HTTP based apps.
FTP over SSL isn't fully standardized from what I can tell. See http://www.ford-hutchinson.com/~fh-1-pfh/ftps-ext