Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment It doesn't matter... (Score 1) 137

if device makers stop supporting their devices after 2 years, and all devices do not get updates at the same time. I used Android all the way up till this year, and the support alone was worth the switch.

For the record, my Android phones were the OG Galaxy S, the Galaxy Note 3, the Galaxy S7, and the OnePlus 6T, all flagship devices.I think I got one full OS update once each, and then abandoned even for security updates. This was untenable for me.

Comment LOL @ Apple (Score 1) 240

Apple is gonna dick people around with the Mac Pro just like they did with the Macbook Pro. They will take away ports and functionality and charge $4,000 dollars for it. I used to be an Apple fan but these last several years seems to show that Apple has given up on the desktop. I would rather they just sell licenses to OS X (or open source it)...their bread and butter are the iOS devices anyway.

Comment There is a reason why workers and production.... (Score 1) 455

are centralized above and beyond efficiency in production, despite the fact that knowledge workers can be sent work digitally and we have high quality teleconferencing if you really need "facetime" (Fuck you, Apple!), they still wake up, put on office clothes, and commute on average 45 minutes to their workplace to do a job that can be done from anyplace in the world. It's about disciplining and control of labor by the bosses. They can make you work at the pace they want you to, regulate your movements, and make you abide to any other policies that they see fit. Hell, if they let them have some autonomy by letting them work at home, they might get the crazy idea to work on their own projects and go independent, taking away profits from Father Corporation that they deserve. Y'know...actually innovate!!!

Comment Neil deGrasse Tyson has it right (Score 1) 470

The reason why the US isnt't doing big science projects is because doesn't have the Soviet Union to play catchup with. The way they fund "innovation" is bass-ackward and will only do so if it is profitable and is "sure to work". As a result we get new electronic gizmos that is basically micronization of older tech and nothing fundamentally radical. David Graeber talks about this in some of his lectures regarding why we don't have robot factories and all the whiz bang tech we were expected to have by now. It's bureaucracy, hierarchy, and how we tend to fund things as a society.

At this time, China isn't really outcompeting the US on any technological strategic front, and the Europeans are more or less on the same squad as the US. If ever the case the Chinese decide to go to Mars, invented a teleporter, or presented a serious strategic threat to the US that may change, but by then it will be too late. I predict that the people to beat in this era will still be the Europeans even in this time of austerity.

If you want innovation, you give a group of smart people who work well together some resources and leave them alone to weave their tapestry of dreams, not regiment them to what bureaucrats think they should be working on or some idiotic timetable.

Slashdot Top Deals

Backed up the system lately?

Working...