The [system] and [role] field for a typical web chat bot has a 1,000 page bible of thou shall and though shall nots to get through before it can digest and answer the query.
Each and every time you submit a query. The providers have continued to add to the response bible with each new jail break or safety concern.
If you want a "surly" teenager answer (read short and curt), use a API call on one. It doesn't come with the baggage but you might not like the answer you get and will have to build a economical preface bible for your API queries. But at least you won't have all the nonsense that gets added to the general purpose LLM query.

"Zoidy wanna buy on margin!"

Teach everyone to run Cipher on an "empty" Windows machine as a minimum before giving it away / selling it with the OS.
"cipher /w:c" or if you have other drives, change as appropriate.

New mantra for 30 under 30 list.

Which also happens to coincide (who knows maybe nothing) with the largest spike in immigrant influx. In 1989 to 1991, Immigration was even higher than the years between 1900 to 1910. And yes, I know the population was smaller back then, but the surrounding years to 1989 to 1991 didn't have anywhere near this spike.
While I do understand that anti-vaxxer children are probably overrepresented in this number, even if you ware vaccinated it will just lower the chances, not eliminate all cases. When we ramp up emigration (legally or illegally) from countries with potentially ineffective or nonexistent vaccinations, expect a spike in communicable diseases.

Sources:
https://www.cdc.gov/measles/da...
https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/a...

They are now.
Claude: "I have access to a real Linux environment where I can actually execute Python and JavaScript code! It's not just intuitive simulation."
ChatGPT says it only has a Python sandbox at the moment and not JS.
So when article subject was using it, maybe no. But now, it will probably be designed and run in a sandbox of some sort with result given back.

The LLM's just using an internal JS sandbox to generate pseudo random numbers on the level that gets generated for HTTPS.
Most LLMs providers are now making general programming tools and calculators available to their LLMs so they don't have to intuit or "grok" these types of programmatic results from their training.
So the LLM data center isn't using enough energy to boil a pot of water just to intuit 2+2.

Spoof the interface to make the attackers believe they are attacking a foreign industrial plant.
In reality, they are attacking the utility plant located down street based on WiFi location.
The main purpose of the honeypot system is to obfuscate the true location of the target (the attackers own infrastructure).
Then watch hilarity ensue.
Defense systems would be great. You could get countries to nuke themselves using their own cyber ops team.

"The Grid.
A digital frontier.
I tried to picture clusters of information as they moved through the computer.
What did they look like?
Ships, motorcycles? Were the circuits like freeways?
I kept dreaming of a world I thought I'd never see.
And then, one day...
I got in."
- Kevin Flynn

Or my car could sense tire traction, temperature and a few other sensor conditions to tell me this on the
big display. Oh wait, it does that now!

(Right, Upper hand corner of this page for me.)
"Wondering what your patents might be worth in the current market?"
Wow! I can't resist selling my patents!
Ahem! Well, back to /.
'Those lousy trolls, I wish they would just go away.'

Which according to your comment would mean that the light difference is only 20dB down in power from the starlight.
Additionally, the planet's light spectra would be different than the light spectra of the star.
Combine these two facts and I believe his question still stands even if he doesn't "know science".
Would the sensor be able to detect the difference?
If background noise at the telescope is at -120dBm (or less with cooling), then is it possible to detect a difference at a specific frequency?