Comment Re:One thing . . . (Score 1) 134
Hello since you obviously think "men are always blasting off" I will try to present a viable rebuttal. Taking an evolutionary biological approach, one may see that we are products of a dimorphic split that occured way before the gene frequency of pheonotypic attributes were tied with race, might account for the differing brain structures of men and women, which are of greater difference than that of the respective genders compared across races. The racial differences (if any) are minimal due to the recent(evolutionary wise)distinction into races, so we may leave the minutia to when an adequete theory of AI comes along. Due to the fundemental and very essential differences between men and women the brain structure difference may be pronounced and been seen as an adaptation to differing enviormental pressures. Men, due to the fact that we have had to sustain and create a viable society, in which the safe and viable propogation of offspring is possible, have had the selection mechanism biased towards linear thinking, creating, planning, sustaining, and logic (think about it men usually hunted for food have had to think and plan how to catch prey, when to act, how to use tools to aid in catching prey etc.). Hence men brain's and thinking tend to follow this evolutionary pattern. One might say that due to the low bandwidth and reletivly low processing power of each indvidual linear command the structures might be simpler and slower, but here is the catch, due to the linear, spatial, and logical nature of the commands one could construct a system which is primarly dedicated to the processing and interaction of linear, spatial, and logical events. Since the events are logical the system implements this logic and hence may be able to extrapolate or construct new events according to logic hence men for a long time have exceled in math and science. From a core level. Women on the other hand as the core of societies exsistence where selected by other criteria, women have had to deal with other women in groups or socieites to adequately survive hence women think more of relationships and how things fit together as a whole rather than individual pieces. But due to the fact that taking in large amounts of information and processing as a whole takes not only more bandwidth but more processing power women developed faster processing centers (for this type of logic) but due to the fact that their brain system is optimized for this method of processing but for detailed and logical calculations it might not be optimum. For instance women may see the relationship between things and the logic is implemented to process and extrapolate new events dealing with relationships. Since math and science have elements of relationships but are much more spatial, linear, and logical the relationship logic is not optimum., but this doesn't mean you can't learn math or even be good at it all it means is that all one has to do is present math and science in a relationship based format. Now due to the fact that both men and women now are not under such a strict enviormental pressures much of the criteria has become lax. You as a hardcore feminst may argue that men have outlived there role as defenders, sustainers, and creators of society and hence are not needed but eliminating an entire gender carries grave moral responsibilites. Now that men have constructed a civilization that depends less on muscle and more on brain power, not to mention one that has advanced so far in science and math that both at a core level are nearly complete the extrapolation of technology is simple, women can now fully and functionally become equals with us due to the loosening of the criteria dimorphism is demphasized both the role of the woman as producer and the role of the man as sustainer have become blurry and will mix into one. Artifical womb technology will really rule out women as bearers of children considering one could implement much better conditions in the womb than any woman could provide. We are heading for asexual beings as a second evolutionary step.