Comment what is skepticism? (Score 1) 880
In my view, skepticism is about trying to make an educated guess about the validity of a scientific claim.
I already hear people say: "what about non-scientific claims, should we not be skeptical about them?". Well, you can be sceptical about them, but unless the claim(er) is willing to be dragged into the scientific realm, all you say is: "Since you reject facts and evidence for a basis of your claim, there is no way for me to check how valid it is..."
And what I mean by "Unless you can drag the claim in the scientific realm" is that most people who make non-scientific claims are reluctant against this idea. For instance, people who claim homeopathy works, do this on the basis of non-scientific claims (like, when diluting a substance in water multiple times, it will not lose it's essence/intensity/effect if you shake the water after diluting it. Doing your own little test with sugar and water will soon prove that it actually does lose it's effect and the water will taste less sweet after diluting it). They don't want the scientific method to touch it, since it'll blow them out of the water (sorry, bad pun) straight away.
This brings us back to the topic question? I've found that teaching people this difference really makes them see which claims they can tackle with skepticism and which claims have no leg to stand on.