Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Twitter, aka @Jack, doesn't care about hate spe (Score 1) 1057

Twitter doesn't care about hate speech, it only cares about harassment, incitement and threats. Like the law in the US does.

That's not what the article says.

"Separately, reporting hateful conduct will also help Twitter better process reports from bystanders, alleviating the burden on the person being subjected to the abuse, Harvey said.

Second, Twitter has retrained support teams, offering sessions that teach the cultural and historical context to help moderators recognize hate speech, and has put in place an ongoing program to refresh employees on abuse and update them on new forms of it, Harvey said."

If they didn't care about policing hate speech in the past they sure will now.

Comment Re:yes they should (Score 1) 1081

In what scenario would the cities on the coast be the only ones that matter?

Look at New Hampshire. It's worth a measly 4 electoral votes, only 0.74% of the electoral college, and still a fairly small amount of the total swing votes reasonably considered to be in play. And yet we saw quite a lot of campaigning and canvassing going on there because it was a very competitive state in a very competitive race (which most presidential races these day are) and at that point every bit that could be secured mattered.

In this election the popular vote was very close, off by only around 1%. Even the counties that are the deepest shades of red or blue contain some often significant fraction of people who could be convinced to vote the other direction. This is especially true in the modern era where people are easily exposed to information well beyond their home town. If one candidate managed to successfully gain votes among this minority over the other they could have very realistically turned the election. This is why a lot of real minority blocs are important to campaigns today; the majority is not considered "enough." Even if they currently only matter if they're in swing states and can tip the election.

The largest cities would have the biggest low hanging fruit, but the campaigns will reach diminishing returns where they feel like they can cause more of a shift in preference and turnout in increasingly less populated areas. Especially if they can reach large swaths of them at a time by appealing to their more unifying values.

This is very different from the winner-takes-all method employed in most states, where the people who voted for the non-majority party literally contribute nothing to the outcome, and in the large number of states that are very entrenched and slowly change affiliation they can know ahead of time that their vote is a waste. Appealing to the minority voters in those states is a waste of time.

Submission + - Full Speed DS Emulator for Android released (google.com) 2

ChronoReverse writes: While ports of DS emulators have shown up for Android, they invariably have trouble running at full speed even on the latest hardware.


This has now changed as Exophase has released a new emulator capable of running DS games at full speeds even on relatively modest hardware while maintaining wide compatibility now available in the Play Store: DraStic

Comment Re:Snesoid was based on Snes9X (Score 1) 190

I don't think they really have any legal standing, but that doesn't mean that they can't coerce Google. I just can't really see why Google would ban yongzh instead of just removing the emulators where they've (allegedly) received complaints from copyright holders. While they may have some interest in making an example of him or sticking to a pretty zero tolerance terms of service on this they're also depriving themselves of a substantial amount of income.

Comment Re:Snesoid was based on Snes9X (Score 5, Informative) 190

yongzh has received a relicense for gpSP by me, the sole copyright holder of the source he forked off of (he isn't using any code from any of the other forks). So Gameboid isn't violating any license agreements. It getting pulled is either at Google's discretion due to complaints against the owner in general or, more likely, Nintendo pressuring him. Remember, Google makes money off of his sales too. I doubt they'd remove emulators that didn't directly correlate to any particular person's specific complaint (nor would they take a complaint from some random non-copyright holder seriously). Nintendo, on the other hand..

Slashdot Top Deals

Statistics are no substitute for judgement. -- Henry Clay

Working...